Comparison of Structural Type and Economics of Super-High Pier for Continuous Rigid Frame Bridge

Article Preview

Abstract:

Three kinds of structural pier forms – double thin wall pier, combined pier and single pier – were designed for prestressed concrete continuous rigid frame bridge with pier height that overs 100m. Taking an example of Hezhang bridge which is located in Guizhou province, the elastic stability at the largest cantilever stage under action of wind loads were analyzed and concrete volume of pier and cushion cap were calculated. The results indicate that the variable cross-section pier has a better performance of elastic stability than that of uniform pier. Considering the construction difficulty, stability performance and material consumption, recommendations for selecting the structural type of pier with height between 100 m~200 m were given.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1370-1376

Citation:

Online since:

July 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Baolin Ma. Super-high Pier Continuous Rigid Frame Bridge [M]. Beijing, China Communications Press, 2001. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[2] Yuke Luo and Pengcheng Feng. Design of Longtan River Bridge [J]. Bridge Construction, Vol. 2, pp.29-32, 2005. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[3] Biyun Wang, Jun Yang and Tingmin Mou, etc. The Application of Concrete Filled Steel Tubular Composite High PiertoThe Long-span Continuous Rigid Frame Bridges [J]. Journal of Highway and TransportationResearch and Development, Vol. 8, pp.46-51.

Google Scholar

[4] Zonglin Wang, Wei Zhang and Liang Xu. Temperature and Verticality on The Effects of Thin-wall High Piers of Continuous Rigid-frame Bridge Stability [J]. Highway, Vol. 6, pp.48-51, 2007. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[5] AnquLi. Large-span Prestressed Continuous Rigid Frame Bridge Pier Optimization Design [J]. Highway, Vol. 10, pp.87-89, 2011. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[6] Yajun Feng, Lei Sun and Yaxun Yang. Continuous Rigid Frame Bridge Girder Depth-span Ratio Optimization Design [J]. Journal of Highway and TransportationResearch and Development, Vol. 8, pp.80-82, 2011. (In Chinese).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.280.80

Google Scholar

[7] Shuo Feng, Yiqiang Xiang and Jingfeng Wang. Random Vibration Response Analysis of Long-span Continuous Rigid Frame Bridge [J]. China Railway Science, Vol. 26, No. 4, pp.32-36, 2005. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[8] Guizhou Transportation Planning Survey & Design Academe Co., LTD. Suvey report of Continuous Rigid Frame Bridges with over 150m high pier[R]. 2013. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[9] Guohao Li. Stability and Vibration of Bridge Structure [M]. Beijing, China Railway Press, 2002. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[10] Tongji University. Wind Load Parameter Study of Hezhang Bridge on Biwei Highway[R]. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[11] Recommended industry standard of the People's Republic of China. Highway Bridge Wind Resistance Design Code(JTG/T D60-01-2004)[S]. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar