Simulation of Hydrodynamic Conditions of a Photobioreactor for Microalgae Cultivation

Article Preview

Abstract:

Under optimum environmental conditions, microalgae are able to accumulate significant amounts of lipids within diminutive span. They are therefore established as promising candidates for the production of biodiesel. In order to develop this, and also to cut down the cost parameter involving the production of biodiesel from algae, the growth rate of algae has to be enhanced. To maintain the proper condition for their growth, closed cultivation is the best option for which different types of reactor are used. Bubble column reactor, is one among them, where the mixing rate of algae with nutrients, growth rate increases. This paper reported the design modification of spiral column reactor which will have better mixing rate than conventional bubble column reactor in turn more mass transfer due to more turbulence which can be seen by analyzing the turbulence kinetic energy against radius for both the reactors, for that CFX solver is been used.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

2427-2431

Citation:

Online since:

July 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Kantarci N., Borak F., Ulgen Kutlu O., 2005. Review on Bubble column reactors, Process Biochemistry, 40: 2263–2283.

DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2004.10.004

Google Scholar

[2] Bitog J.P., Lee I.B., Lee C. -G., Kim K. -S., Hwang H.S., Hong S.W., Seo I.H., Kwon K.S., Mostafa E., 2011, Application of computational fluid dynamics for modeling and designing photo bioreactors for microalgae production: A review, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 76(2): 131–147.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2011.01.015

Google Scholar

[3] Ekambara K., Dhotre M.T., 2010, CFD simulation of bubble column, Nuclear Engineering and Design, 240(5): 963–969.

DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2010.01.016

Google Scholar

[4] Ishii M., Zuber N., 1979. Drag coefficient and relative velocity in bubbly, droplet or particulate flows,. AIChE Journal, 25(5): 843–855.

DOI: 10.1002/aic.690250513

Google Scholar

[5] Tomiyama A., Tamai H., Zun I., Hosokawa S., 2002. Transverse migration of single bubbles in simple shear flows,. Chemical Engineering Science, 57(11): 1849-1858.

DOI: 10.1016/s0009-2509(02)00085-4

Google Scholar

[6] Lopez de Bertodano M.A., 1992. Turbulent bubbly two-phase flow in a triangular duct,. Ph.D. Dissertation, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. 110 Eighth Street, Troy, NY USA 12180.

Google Scholar

[7] Antal S., Lahey R., Flaherty J., 1991. Analysis of phase distribution in fully-developed laminar bubbly two phase flow,. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 17(5): 635-652.

DOI: 10.1016/0301-9322(91)90029-3

Google Scholar

[8] Zhang D., Deen N.G., Kuipers J.A. M, 2006, Numerical simulation of the dynamic flow behavior in a bubble column: A study of closures for turbulence and interface forces, Chemical Engineering Science, 61(23): 7593 – 7608.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2006.08.053

Google Scholar

[9] Silva M. K., d'Ávila Marcos A., Mori M., 2012 Study of the interfacial forces and turbulence models in a bubble column, Computers and Chemical Engineering, 44: 34– 44.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2012.04.007

Google Scholar