Parametric Modeling of GTA Welding Process for Dissimilar Metals through Response Surface Methodology

Article Preview

Abstract:

The gas tungsten arc welding (GTAW) process is generally implemented for fusion welding of stainless steel, magnesium alloys, nickel base alloys, carbon steel and low alloy steels. This study deals with the parametric modeling of gas tungsten arc (GTA) welding process for two dissimilar metals specifically stainless steel and low carbon steel. There are several process parameters influences the quality of weld strength namely arc voltage, gas flow rate, torch distance, current and welding speed to be used. Among the various process parameters, the arc voltage, gas flow rate and torch distance were considered for this analysis with the response of tensile strength. Twenty experiments were performed as per response surface methodology (RSM) based central composite face centered design for GTAW process. Comparison studies were made for predicted and experimental values of tensile or weld strength by using analysis of variance (ANOVA). It was found that developed model statistically fit on 95% confidence level.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

673-677

Citation:

Online since:

July 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] S. Elangovan, S. Venkateshwaran and K. Prakasan, Experimental investigations on optimization of ultrasonic welding parameters for copper to brass joints using response surface method and genetic algorithm, International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Studies E-ISSN2249–8974, (2012).

Google Scholar

[2] G. Padmanaban and V. Balasubramanian, Optimization of laser beam welding process parameter to attain maximum tensile strength in AZ31B magnesium, Optics & laser Technology Vol. 42 (2010), pp.1253-1260.

DOI: 10.1016/j.optlastec.2010.03.019

Google Scholar

[3] N. Lenin, M. Sivakumar and D. Vigneshkumar, Process parameter optimization in ARC welding of dissimilar metals, Thammasat International Journal of science and Technology Vol. 15 (3) (2010), pp.1-7.

Google Scholar

[4] D. C. Montgomery, Design and Analysis of Experiments, Third Edition, John Wiley and sons, New York (1991).

Google Scholar

[5] M. M. A. Khan, L. Romoli, Marco Fiaschi,  G. Dini, and F. Sarri , Multiresponse optimization of laser welding of stainless steels in a constrained fillet joint configuration using RSM", International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 62 (5-8) (2012).

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-011-3835-z

Google Scholar

[6] S.C. Juang and Y.S. Tamg, Process parameter selection for optimizing the weld pool geometry in the tungsten inert gas welding of stainless steel, Journal of Material Processing Technology Vol. 122 (2002), pp.33-37.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(02)00021-3

Google Scholar

[7] Farhad Kolahan and Mehdi Heidari, A New Approach for Predicting and Optimizing Weld Bead Geometry in GMAW, International Journal of Mechanical Systems science and engineering Vol. 2 (2010), pp.138-142.

Google Scholar