Comparison of Machining Responses Using Multiple Regression Analysis and Group Method Data Handling Technique of EN-19 Material in WEDM

Article Preview

Abstract:

Wire Electrical Discharge Machining (WEDM) is a specialized thermal machining process capable of accurately machining parts with varying hardness or complex shapes, which have sharp edges that are very difficult to be machined by the main stream machining processes. This study outlines the development of model and its application to estimation and comparison of machining responses using Multiple Regression Analysis (MRA) and Group Method Data Handling Technique (GMDH). Experimentation was performed as per Taguchi’s L’16 orthogonal array for EN-19 material. Each experiment has been performed under different cutting conditions of pulse-on, pulse-off, current and bed speed. Among different process parameters voltage and flush rate were kept constant. Molybdenum wire having diameter of 0.18 mm was used as an electrode. Four responses namely accuracy, surface roughness, volumetric material removal rate and electrode wear have been considered for each experiment. Estimation and comparison of responses was carried out using MRA and GMDH.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

97-101

Citation:

Online since:

July 2014

Keywords:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Azlan Mohd Zain, Habibollah Haron, Sultan Noman Qasem and Safian Sharif, Regression and ANN models for estimating minimum value of machining performance, Applied Mathematical Modelling, Vol. 36, (2012), pp.1477-1492.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2011.09.035

Google Scholar

[2] Nihat Tosun, Can Cogun and Gul Tosun, A study on kerf and material removal rate in wire electrical discharge machining based on Taguchi method, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 152, (2004), p.316–322.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.373

Google Scholar

[3] Shunsuke Tomura and Masanori Kunieda, Analysis of electromagnetic force in wire-EDM, Precision Engineering, Vol. 33, (2009), p.255–262.

DOI: 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2008.07.004

Google Scholar

[4] Y.S. Liao, M.T. Yan and C.C. Chang, A neural network approach for the on-line estimation of workpiece height in WEDM, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 121, (2002), p.252–258.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(01)01252-3

Google Scholar

[5] VenkataRao. R and V.D. Kalyankar, Parameter optimization of modern machining processes using teaching–learning-based optimization algorithm, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 26, (2013), p.524–531.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engappai.2012.06.007

Google Scholar

[6] Probir Saha, Debashis Tarafdar, Surjya K. Pal, Partha Saha, Ashok K. Srivastava and Karabi Das, Multi-objective optimization in wire-electro-discharge machining of TiC reinforced composite through Neuro-Genetic technique, Applied Soft Computing, Vol. 13, (2013).

DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2012.11.008

Google Scholar

[7] Vineet Srivastava and Pulak M. Pandey, Effect of process parameters on the performance of EDM process with ultrasonic assisted cryogenically cooled electrode, Journal of Manufacturing Processes, Vol. 14, (2012), 393–402.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2012.05.001

Google Scholar

[8] M. Durairaj, D. Sudharsun and N. Swamynathan, Analysis of Process Parameters in Wire EDM with Stainless Steel using Single Objective Taguchi Method and Multi Objective Grey Relational Grade, Procedia Engineering, Vol. 64, (2013), p.868–877.

DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.09.163

Google Scholar

[9] Sengottuvel. P, Satishkumar and Dinakaran. D, Optimization of Multiple Characteristics of EDM Parameters Based on Desirability Approach and Fuzzy Modeling, Procedia Engineering, Vol. 64, (2013), p.1069–1078.

DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.09.185

Google Scholar

[10] Vignesh Shanmugam S, Krishnaraj V, Jagdeesh K A, Varun Kumar S and Subash S, Numerical Modelling of Electro-Discharge Machining Process using Moving Mesh Feature, Procedia Engineering, Vol. 64, (2013), p.747–756.

DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.09.150

Google Scholar