Ductility Reduction Factors for Steel Buildings Modeled as 2D and 3D Structures

Article Preview

Abstract:

The global ductility parameter (μG), commonly used to represent the capacity of a structure to dissipate energy, and the associated ductility reduction factor (Rμ), are estimated for steel buildings with perimeter moment resisting frames (PMRF), which are modeled as 2D and 3D complex MDOF systems. Results indicate that the μG value of 4, commonly assumed for moment resisting steel frames, cannot be justified. A value of 3 is more reasonable. The values of μG and Rμ may be quite different for 2D and 3D structural representations or for local and global response parameters, showing the limitation of the commonly used Equivalent Lateral Force Procedure (ELFP). Thus, the ductility and ductility reduction factors obtained from simplified structural representation must be taken with caution.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

166-172

Citation:

Online since:

July 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] C.M. Uang: Establishing R (or Rw) and Cd Factors for Building Seismic Provisions, Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE Volume 117(1), (1991), pp.19-28.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1991)117:1(19)

Google Scholar

[2] C.M. Uang: Structural Overstrength and Limit State Philosophy in Seismic Design Provisions. Report No CE-91-03 Department of Civil Engineering, Northeastern University (1991).

Google Scholar

[3] E. Miranda and V. Bertero: Evaluation of Strength Reduction Factors for Earthquake-Resistant Desing, Earthquake Spectra Volume 10(2), 1994, pp.57-379.

DOI: 10.1193/1.1585778

Google Scholar

[4] N.M. Newmar and W.J. Hall: Earthquake Spectra and Design Monograph Series, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute Berkeley, California (1982).

Google Scholar

[5] A.H. Hadjia: An Evaluation of the Ductility Reduction Factor Q in the 1976 Regulations for the Federal District of Mexico Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Volume 18 (1989), pp.217-231.

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.4290180207

Google Scholar

[6] D. Arroyo-Espinoza and A. Teran-Gilmore: Strength reduction factors for ductile structures with passive energy dissipating devices, Journal of Earthquake Engineering, Volume 7(2), (2003), p.297–325.

DOI: 10.1080/13632460309350450

Google Scholar

[7] D. Karmakar and V.K. Gupta: A parametric study of strength reduction factors for elasto-plastic oscillators, Sādhanā, volume 31(4), (2006), pp.343-357.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02716781

Google Scholar

[8] A. Ayouba and M. Chenouda: Response spectra of degrading structural systems, Engineering Structures, Volume 31, (2009), pp.1393-1402.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.02.006

Google Scholar

[9] L. Sanchez-Ricart and A. Plumier: Parametric study of ductile moment-resisting steel frames: A first step towards Eurocode 8 calibration, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, Volume 37(7), (2008), pp.1135-1155.

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.809

Google Scholar

[10] A. Reyes-Salazar and A. Haldar: Seismic Response and Energy Dissipation in Partially Restrained and Fully Restrained Steel Frames: An Analytical Study, Steel & Composite Structures, An International Journal, Volume 1(4), (2001), pp.459-480.

DOI: 10.12989/scs.2001.1.4.459

Google Scholar

[11] A. Reyes-Salazar: Ductility and Ductility Reduction Factors, Structural Engineering and Mechanics An International Journal, Volume13(4), (2002), pp.369-385.

DOI: 10.12989/sem.2002.13.4.369

Google Scholar

[12] A. Nassar A and H. Krawinkler: Seismic Demands of SDOF and MDOF Systems, John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Report No. 95, Stanford University (1991).

Google Scholar

[13] J. Cai, J. Zhou and X. Fang: Seismic Ductility Reduction Factors for Multi-Degree-of-Freedom Systems, Advances in Structural Engineering Volume 9(5), (2006), pp.591-601.

DOI: 10.1260/136943306778827547

Google Scholar

[14] A.K. Chopra: Dynamics of Structures, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, (2007).

Google Scholar

[15] M. Ceylan, M.H. Arsla, R. Ceylan, M.Y. Kaltakci, Y. Ozbay: A new application area of ANN and ANFIS: determination of earthquake load reduction factor of prefabricated industrial buildings, Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems, Volume 27(1), (2010).

DOI: 10.1080/10286600802506726

Google Scholar

[16] B. Ganjavi and H. Hao: Effect of structural characteristics distribution of strength demand and ductility reduction factor of MDOF systems considering soil-structure interaction, Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Volume 11, pp.205-220.

DOI: 10.1007/s11803-012-0111-7

Google Scholar

[17] L. Gao and A. Haldar: Nonlinear Seismic Analysis of Space Structures with PR connections, International Journal of Microcomputers in Civil Engineering, Volume 10, (1995), pp.27-37.

Google Scholar

[18] Federal Emergency Management Agency, State of the Art Report on Systems Performance of Steel Moment Frames Subjected to Earthquake Ground Shaking, SAC Steel Project, Report 355C (2000).

Google Scholar