Unbalanced Power Allocation Method to the Research of the Influence of the Power System Trend

Article Preview

Abstract:

After the disturbance of the power system, all generators of the system will react the disturb and adjust the output. All unbalanced power in the traditional method of trend fully will be assumed by the balancing bus, obviously do not conform to the actual operation situation. Dynamic power flow calculation can effectively deal with this problem, the current calculation method of the unbalanced power distribution exist two kinds of thinking:based on moment of inertia of the generator and based on the frequency characteristic coefficient of the generator . Here, this paper state the two methods of distribution , through analysis and comparison ,use case simulation verify the influence of the different methods of distribution on the system steady trend.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

687-691

Citation:

Online since:

July 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] ScotB. Review of Load Flow Calculation Methods. Proc. IEEE. 1974, 62(7): 916~929.

Google Scholar

[2] William.F. Tinney, Clifford E. Hart. Power flow solution by Newton's method [J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Appartus and Systems, 1967, PAS-86(11): 1449~1460.

DOI: 10.1109/tpas.1967.291823

Google Scholar

[3] Le Nguyen H. Newton-Raphson method in complex form[J]. IEEE Trans on Power Systems, 1997, 12(3): 1355~1359.

DOI: 10.1109/59.630481

Google Scholar

[4] Ge Baojun, Wang Ming, Lv Yanling et al. Study on Static Power Characteristic of Huge Hydro-Generator[C]. Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference (APPEEC 2010). [v. 1]. 2010: 282-285.

DOI: 10.1109/appeec.2010.5448679

Google Scholar

[5] Huang, H., Li, F. Sensitivity Analysis of Load-Damping Characteristic in Power System Frequency Regulation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2013, 28(2): 1324-1335.

DOI: 10.1109/tpwrs.2012.2209901

Google Scholar