Simulation Based Multi-Criteria Assessment of Lean Material Flow Design Alternatives

Abstract:

In this article a procedure is introduced to improve transparency and reliability of results for the selection of material flow design alternatives including machine tools and other capital-intensive goods. In the design phase of material flow planning projects, key performance indicators (KPIs) for design alternatives including processing as well as intralogistics elements can be derived using simulation. Using the state of the art method in value stream design and simulation often volatile input data is taken into account only in the simulation itself, but not in the downstream comparison of alternative designs, which could lead to imprecise conclusions and therefore to wrong investment decisions. To overcome this issue and to consider variability in the whole simulation phase and a subsequent decision making process, a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) with two fuzzy representations is proposed and discussed here with the aim of helping practitioners to get more competitive value streams. A further goal of the article is the comparison between both forms used for fuzzy representation. Using the design example of machine tool-intralogistics systems obtained results are discussed.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volume 598)
• Pages: 661-666
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.598.661
• Online since: July 2014
• Authors: Markus Philipp Roessler*, Eberhard Abele, Joachim Metternich
• Keywords: Investment Decision, Lean Production, Material Flow, Simulation, Variability

References

[1] Behrend, A; Abele, E; Emrich, A (2007). Together - one after another – cellular manufacturing as an economic alternative for complete machining (in German). Werkstatt und Betrieb 12, p.68–72.

[2] Womack, J; Jones, D; Roos, D (1990). The machine that changed the world. Free Press, New York.

[3] Roessler, M; Wolff, M; Abele, E (2013). Design and simulation based assessment of lean material flows considering imprecision. 6th MCPL Conference. Fortaleza, Brazil, September 11-13, (2013).

DOI: 10.3182/20130911-3-br-3021.00021

[4] Sturm, F; Muetze-Niewoehner, S; Gaertner, T; Schreiber, S; Gregorius, C; Werkle, M (2009). Growth through change to solution providers (in German). Werkstattstechnik online 7-8, p.518–525.

DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2009-7-8-518

[5] Detty, R; Yingling, J (2000). Quantifying benefits of conversion to lean manufacturing with discrete event simulation. A case study. Journal of Production Research 38(2), p.429–445.

DOI: 10.1080/002075400189509

[6] McDonald, T; van Aken, E; Rentes, A (2002). Utilising simulation to enhance value stream mapping. A manufacturing case application. Journal of Logistics Research and Applications 5(2), p.213–232.

DOI: 10.1080/13675560210148696

[7] Standridge, C; Marvel, J (2006). Why lean needs simulation. Winter Simulation Conference 2006. In: Perrone, L et al. (Eds. ): Proceedings of the 2006 Winter Simulation Conference. IEEE, p.1907–(1913).

DOI: 10.1109/wsc.2006.322973

[8] Abdulmalek, F; Rajgopal, J (2007). Analyzing the benefits of lean manufacturing and value stream mapping via simulation. Journal of Production Economics 107(1), p.223–236.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.09.009

[9] Azadeh, A; Seifoory, M; Abbasi, M (2007). Integration of simulation and fuzzy madm for modelling and assessment of fuzzy parameters. Industrial and Systems Engineering 6(4), p.483–502.

DOI: 10.1504/ijise.2010.036029

[10] Lian, Y; van Landeghem, H (2002).

[11] Abele, E; Wolff, M; Roessler, M (2012). Simulation based evaluation of machine tool-inralogistics systems (in German). Zeitschrift fuer wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb 107(7-8), p.503–507.

[12] Domschke, W; Scholl, A (2005). Fundamentals of business economics (in German). Springer, Berlin.

[13] Maerz, L; Krug, H; Rose, O; Weigert, G. (2011). Simulation and optimization of production and logistics (in German). Springer, Berlin.

[14] Zadeh, L (1965). Fuzzy sets. Journal of Information and Control 8(3), p.338–353.

[15] Chen, S; Hwang, C; Hwang, C. (1992). Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making. Methods and applications (lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems). Springer, New York.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-46768-4_5

[16] Geldermann, J; Sprengler, T; Rentz, O (2000). Fuzzy outranking for environmental assessment. Case study: Iron and steel making industry. Fuzzy sets and systems 115, p.45–65.

DOI: 10.1016/s0165-0114(99)00021-4

[17] Cramér, H (1946). Mathematical methods of statistics. Princeton University Press, USA.

[18] Hwang, C; Yoon, K (1981). Multiple attribute decision making. Methods and applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.

[19] Belton, V; Stewart, T (2002). Multiple criteria decision making. An integrated approach. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.

[20] Brans, J; Mareschal, B; Vincke, P (1984). PROMETHEE: A new family of outranking methods in multicriteria analysis. Journal of Operational Research, p.477–490.

[21] Queiruga, D; Walther, G; Gonzales-Benito, J; Sprengler, T (2008). Evaluation of sites for the location of weee recycling plants in Spain. Journal of Waste Management 28, p.181–190.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2006.11.001