The Differences Analysis of Input-Output Efficiency of Regional R&D Activities Based on DEA

Article Preview

Abstract:

Research and development activities plays an important role in regional science and technology development and technological innovation. Regional R&D input-output efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of regional investment in science and technology activities. This paper selects four indicators to make evaluation of the input-output efficiency of R&D activities and analysis of differences between regions by using data envelopment analysis (DEA method).

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1764-1767

Citation:

Online since:

August 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Chen Juan, Li Yunyan, Li Yanhong, Analysis of input and output efficiency of R&D activities in Hebei [J] Market Modernization, 2008, (14) : 232-233 DOI: 10. 3969/j. issn. 1006-3102. 2008. 14. 166.

Google Scholar

[2] Hou Zhenmei, Zhou Yong. Analysis of characteristics of R&D investment in Xinjiang [J]. Foreign trade, 2013, (2): 79-81.

Google Scholar

[3] Wang Di, Nie Rui. Analysis growth drivers and difference of eastern China's economy [J] Technology and Economy, 2010, 23 (3): 55-58 DOI: 10. 3969/j. issn. 1003- 7691. 2010. 03. 014.

Google Scholar

[4] Li Guangjin, Yan Hong. The DEA model measures inputs-output technical efficiency [J] Systems Engineering Theory and Practice, 2002, 22 (1): 26-32.

Google Scholar

[5] Yan Pengfei, Wang Bing. Technical efficiency, technological progress and productivity growth: an empirical analysis based on DEA [J] Economic Research, 2004, (12): 55-65.

Google Scholar

[6] National Bureau of Statistics. China Statistical Yearbook 2011 [M]. China Statistics Press . (2012).

Google Scholar

[7] Science and technology indicators research group. Regional science and technology indicators 2011 [M]. Science and technology indicators research group . (2012).

Google Scholar