A Comparison of Methodologies for Intelligent Computing Used to Integrity Analysis of a Structure Aeronautic

Article Preview

Abstract:

This article presents the application and comparison of two techniques for intelligent computing to perform the analysis of the structural integrity of an aircraft structure. In this context, a ARTMAP-Fuzzy neural network and immunological negative selection algorithm are used in the identification and characterization of structural failure. The main application of these methodologies is to assist in the inspection of aircraft structures aiming at detecting and characterize flaws and decision making. To evaluate the methodology was performed modeling and simulation of signals from a numerical model using an aluminum beam. We performed a comparative analysis of methodologies, proving the efficiency of intelligent methods in the analysis of structural integrity. The results obtained by the method show efficiency, robustness and accuracy. To Evaluate the methodology was Performed modeling and simulation of signals from the numerical model using an aluminum beam. We performed a comparative analysis of methodologies, proving the efficiency of intelligent methods in the analysis of structural integrity. The results Obtained by the methods show efficiency, robustness and accuracy.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] G. A. Carpenter; S. Grossberg, N. Markuzon; J. H. Reynold and D. B. Rosen. Fuzzy ARTMAP: A neural network for incremental supervised learning of analog multidimensional maps. IEEE Transactions on Neural Network, vol. 3, n. 5, pp.689-713, (1992).

DOI: 10.1109/72.159059

Google Scholar

[2] G. A. Carpenter and S. Grossberg. A massively parallel architecture for a self-organizing neural pattern recognition machine. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, pp.54-115, (1987).

DOI: 10.1016/s0734-189x(87)80014-2

Google Scholar

[3] D. W. Bradley and A. M. Tyrrell. Immunotronics - Novel Finite-State-Machine Architectures with Built-In Self-Test Using Self-Nonself Differentiation. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation. Vol. 6, p.227–238 (2002).

DOI: 10.1109/tevc.2002.1011538

Google Scholar

[4] L. N. de Castro and J. TIMMIS. Artificial Immune Systems: A New Computational Intelligence Approach, Springer. 1st edition, (2002).

Google Scholar

[5] S. Forrest; A. Perelson; L. Allen and R. Cherukuri. Self-Nonself Discrimination in a computer, Proc. do IEEE Symposium on Research in Security and Privacy, pp.202-212 (1994).

DOI: 10.1109/risp.1994.296580

Google Scholar

[6] V. Giurgiutiu. Tuned lamb wave excitation and detection with piezoelectric wafer active sensors for structural health monitoring. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, USA, v. 16, n. 4, p.291–305, (2005).

DOI: 10.1177/1045389x05050106

Google Scholar

[7] F. P. A. Lima; A. D. P. Lotufo and C. R. Minussi. Artificial Immune Systems Applied to Voltage Disturbance Diagnosis in Distribution Electrical Systems, PowerTech-2013, Grenoble, France, Junhe-2013, 6 p, (2013).

DOI: 10.1109/ptc.2013.6652127

Google Scholar

[8] Matlab (2011). 7. 8 Version, Mathworks Company.

Google Scholar

[9] T. Shen; F. Wan; B. Song; Y. Wu. Damage Location and Identification of the Wing Structure With probabilistic neural Networks. Prognostics & System Health Management Conference (PHM 2011). p.1–6, (2011).

DOI: 10.1109/phm.2011.5939524

Google Scholar

[10] S. Zheng; X. Wang; L. Liu. Damage detection in composite materials based upon the computational mechanics and neural networks. In: European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Munich, p.609–615 (2004).

Google Scholar

[11] F. L. Wang; T. H. T. Chan; D. P. Thambiratnam and A. C. C. Tan. Damage Diagnosis for Complex Steel Truss Bridges Using Multi-Layer Genetic Algorithm. Journal of Civil structural Health Monitoring, Springer-Verlag, p.117–217, (2013).

DOI: 10.1007/s13349-013-0041-8

Google Scholar