Information Quantitative Analysis on Psychological Research

Article Preview

Abstract:

With the fast development of the theories and techniques in information science in recent years, a variety of new methods have been used to help scholars in other fields manage the corresponding knowledge. This paper applied the research methods of information science to psychology to analyze the literature in psychology cited by ISI Web of Knowledge, then got a better understanding of psychology science. In order to understand the dynamics of psychology science, we conducted a quantitative analysis based on 8137 articles cited by SCI or SSCI, and used CiteSpace II to visualize the trends and patterns in the scientific literatures. In the end, the authors drew the following conclusions: (1) among all the individual authors, Cohen J and Seligman MEP share the highest citation times; (2) publications like Positive Psychology - An Introduction, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences have ranked first in the cited papers; (3) community psychology, clinical psychology, behavior, personality, model, self-are the hot areas and the frontier fields in psychology research.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

680-685

Citation:

Online since:

August 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Chen Yue and Liu Ze-yuan, The rise of mapping knowledge domain, Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal, vol. 23, no. 2, p.149–154, (2005).

Google Scholar

[2] White H D and McCain K W, Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC, vol. 49, no. 4, pp.327-355, (1998).

DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(19980401)49:4<327::aid-asi4>3.0.co;2-w

Google Scholar

[3] Chen C, Hu Z and Liu S, Emerging trends in regenerative medicine: a scientometric analysis in CiteSpace, Expert Opin Biol Ther, vol. 12, no. 5, pp.593-608, (2012).

DOI: 10.1517/14712598.2012.674507

Google Scholar

[4] Positive Psychology Research(2007, December). University of Pennsylvania. [Online]. Available: http: /www. ppc. sas. upenn. edu/positivepsychologyresearch. htm.

Google Scholar

[5] Small H and Griffith B C, The structure of scientific literatures I: Identifying and graphing specialties, STS, vol. 4, no. 1, pp.17-40, (1974).

DOI: 10.1177/030631277400400102

Google Scholar

[6] Seligman M E P and Csikszentmihalyi M, Positive psychology: an introduction, AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, vol. 55, no. 1, May (2000).

Google Scholar

[7] American Psychiatric Association, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th ed. Arlington, U.S.A.: Amer Psychiatric Pub Inc, (1994).

Google Scholar

[8] Cohen J, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciencies, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, (1988).

Google Scholar

[9] Cheng S, Ding L. A Quantitative Study on the Research Fronts of Electronic Government, in Proc. BIFE, 2012, pp.481-485.

Google Scholar

[10] Belvaux G, Wolsey LA and Bc-prod, a specialized branch-and-cut system for lot-sizing problems, MANAG SCI, vol. 46, no. 5, p.724–738, (2000).

DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.46.5.724.12048

Google Scholar