Prediction of the Strength of the Adhesively Bonded Joints by the Finite Elements Method

Article Preview

Abstract:

Using the Abaqus software, the goal of this work is the numerical study of the effects of the static loads on the mechanical behavior, the damage and the strength of the aluminum/aluminum and composite/composite assemblies, very much used in the naval field. For an elastic behavior of the adhesive, it is also a question of modeling the damage of the substrates in composite. This paper presents a numerical investigation on the behavior of structural adhesive bounding under quasi-static loading. It is shown the effects of the adhesive thickness, superposition length and staking lay up on the strength of the adhesively bonded joints under static tensile. A comparison between the use of aluminum and composite laminate substrates is presented and an attempt was made to find out the damage kinetic.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

125-134

Citation:

Online since:

June 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] V. Shenoy, I.A. Ashcroft, G.W. Critchlow, A.D. Crocombe. Fracture mechanics and damage mechanics based fatigue lifetime prediction of adhesively bonded joints subjected to variable amplitude fatigue. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Volume 77, Issue 7, May 2010, Pages 1073-1090.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.03.008

Google Scholar

[2] M. Quaresimin, M. Ricotta. Life prediction of bonded joints in composite materials. International Journal of Fatigue, Volume 28, Issue 10, October 2006, Pages 1166-1176.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.02.005

Google Scholar

[3] Gordon Kelly. Quasi-static strength and fatigue life of hybrid (bonded/bolted) composite single-lap joints Composite Structures, Volume 72, Issue 1, January 2006, Pages 119-129.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.11.002

Google Scholar

[4] M.P. Wnuk. Structural integrity of bonded joints. Physical Mesomechanics, Volume 13, Issues 5-6, September-December 2010, Pages 255-267.

DOI: 10.1016/j.physme.2010.11.006

Google Scholar

[5] Volkersen, O. (1938). Die Nietkraft Verteilung in Zugbeanspruchten mit Konstanten Laschenquerschritten, Luftfahrtforschung 15, 41-47.

Google Scholar

[6] Demarkles, L. R. (1955). Investigation on the use of rubber analogue in the study of the stress distribution in riveted and cemented joints, NASA TN3413.

Google Scholar

[7] Goland, M. and Reissner, E. (1944). The stresses in cemented joints, J. Applied Mechanics 11, A17-A27.

DOI: 10.1115/1.4009336

Google Scholar

[8] Hart-Smith, L. J. (1973). Further developments in the design and analysis of adhesive-bonded structural joints, Douglas Aircraft Co. Report 6922.

Google Scholar

[9] Oplinger, D. W. (1991). A layered beam theory for single lap joints, U. S. Army Materials Technolgy Laboratory, Report # MTL TR 91-23.

Google Scholar

[10] Tsai, M. Y. and Morton, J. (1994a). An evaluation of analytical and numerical solutions to the single-lap joint, Int. J. Solids Structures 31, 2537-2563.

DOI: 10.1016/0020-7683(94)90036-1

Google Scholar

[11] Allman, D. J. (1977). A theory for elastic stresses in adhesive bonded lap joints, Quaterly J. Mechanics and Applied Mathematics 30, 415-436.

DOI: 10.1093/qjmam/30.4.415

Google Scholar

[12] Bigwood, D. A. and Crocombe, A. D. (1989). Elastic analysis and engineering design formulae for bonded joints., Int. J. Adhesion and Adhesives 9, 229-242.

DOI: 10.1016/0143-7496(89)90066-3

Google Scholar

[13] Bigwood, D. A. and Crocombe, A. D. (1990). Non-linear adhesive bonded joint design analysis., Int. J. Adhesion and Adhesives 10, 31-41.

DOI: 10.1016/0143-7496(90)90025-s

Google Scholar

[14] Adams, R. D. and Mallick, V. (1992). A method for the stress analysis of lap joints, J. Adhesion 38, 199-217.

DOI: 10.1080/00218469208030455

Google Scholar