Optimization of Tube Hydroforming Process Using Probabilistic Constraints on Failure Modes

Abstract:

In metal forming processes, different parameters (Material constants, geometric dimensions, loads …) exhibits unavoidable scatter that lead the process unreliable and unstable. In this paper, we interest particularly in tube hydroforming process (THP). This process consists to apply an inner pressure combined to an axial displacement to manufacture the part. During the manufacturing phase, inappropriate choice of the loading paths can lead to failure. Deterministic approaches are unable to optimize the process with taking into account to the uncertainty. In this work, we introduce the Reliability-Based Design Optimization (RBDO) to optimize the process under probabilistic considerations to ensure a high reliability level and stability during the manufacturing phase and avoid the occurrence of such plastic instability. Taking account of the uncertainty offer to the process a high stability associated with a low probability of failure. The definition of the objective function and the probabilistic constraints takes advantages from the Forming Limit Diagram (FLD) and the Forming Limit Stress Diagram (FLSD) used as a failure criterion to detect the occurrence of wrinkling, severe thinning, and necking. A THP is then introduced as an example to illustrate the proposed approach. The results show the robustness and efficiency of RBDO to improve thickness distribution and minimize the risk of potential failure modes.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volume 62)
• Pages: 21-35
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.62.21
• Online since: June 2011
• Authors: Anis Ben Abdessalem, A. El Hami
• Keywords: FLD, FLSD, Hydroforming Process, Optimization, Reliability Analysis, Uncertainty

References

[1] Aydemir, A et al. An adaptive simulation approach designed for tube hydroforming processes. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, May 2004, vol. 159, pp.303-310.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.05.018

[2] Jansson, M, et al, On process parameter estimation for the tube hydroforming process. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2007, vol. 190, pp.1-11.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.02.050

[3] Fann, K-J, Hsiao, P-Y, Optimization of loading conditions for tube hydroforming. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2003, vol. 140, pp.520-524.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(03)00778-7

[4] Imaninejad, M et al. Loading path optimization of tube hydroforming process. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, March 2005, vol. 45, pp.1504-1515.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2005.01.029

[5] Abderrabbo, N, et al. Wrinkling control in aluminum sheet hydroforming. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2005, Vol. 47, p.333–358.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2005.02.003

[6] Cherouat, A. et al. Numerical improvement of thin tubes hydroforming with respect to ductile damage. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2002, Vol. 44, pp.2427-2446.

DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7403(02)00177-7

[7] Gantar, G, Kuzman, k, Optimization of stamping processes aiming at maximal process stability. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2005, vol. 167, pp.237-243.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.05.027

[8] Karthk, V., et al. Variability of sheet formability and formability testing. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2002, Vol. 121, p.350–362.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(01)01219-5

[9] Zhang, W, Shivpuri, R. Probabilistic design of aluminum sheet drawing for reduced risk of wrinkling and fracture. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, March 2008, vol. 94, pp.152-161.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2008.02.024

[10] Youn, Byeng D, et al. A new response surface methodology for reliability-based design optimization. Computers and structures, September 2003, vol. 82, pp.241-256.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2003.09.002

[11] Enevoldsen I, Sorensen JD. Reliability-based optimization in structural engineering. Struct Safety 1994; 15: 169–96.

[12] Youn, B, D, Choi, K, K. Selecting probabilistic approaches for reliability-based design optimization. AIAA Journal. 2008, 42, p.124–131.

DOI: 10.2514/1.9036

[13] Bing, Li, et al. Reliability analysis of the tube hydroforming process based on forming limit diagram. Journal of pressure vessel technology, 2006, Vol. 128, p.402–407.

DOI: 10.1115/1.2218344

[14] Kleiber, M et al. Response surface method for probabilistic assessment of metal forming failures. International journal for numerical methods in engineering, 2004, Vol. 60, pp.51-67.

DOI: 10.1002/nme.954

[15] Bing, L et al. Improving the Reliability of the Tube-Hydroforming Process by the Taguchi Method. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, May 2007, vol. 129, pp.242-247.

DOI: 10.1115/1.2716427

[16] Kleiber, M et al. Reliability assessment for sheet metal forming operations. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, August 2002, Vol. 191, pp.4511-4532.

DOI: 10.1016/s0045-7825(02)00394-8

[17] Koç, M et al. Prediction of forming limits and parameter in the tube hydroforming process. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 2002, vol. 42, pages 123-138.

DOI: 10.1016/s0890-6955(01)00048-7

[18] Donglai, W, et al, Optimization and tolerance prediction of sheet metal forming process using response surface model. Computational materials science, 2008, vol. 42, pp.228-233.

DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2007.07.014

[19] Jansson, T et al. Reliability analysis of a sheet metal forming process using Monte-Carlo analysis and metamodels. Journal of materials processing technology, 2007, vol. 202, pp.255-268.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.09.005

[20] Myers, R, H, Montgomery, D, C. Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments. 2nd ed. USA. John Wiley and sons. ISBN 0-471-41255-4.

[21] ABAQUS Inc., ABAQUS/Explicit User's Manual, Version 6. 5, (2005).

[22] The Mathworks. Manuel de référence du logiciel Matlab, (2007).