Multiaxial Fatigue Life Prediction of the CII Platform Leg Based on Critical Plane Energy Method

Article Preview

Abstract:

Based on the critical plane energy method to build a plastic strain energy function on the critical plane, the approach of hot spot plastic strain energy as assessment parameters of fatigue damage is used and the shortcomings that the traditional energy method as a scalar is difficult to describe the direction of crack propagation is overcomed. By the rules of cracks expansion through critical plane, the fatigue life model parameters have a clear physical significance. W-S algorithm process is deduced, so the complex stress state is equivalent to a series of symmetric cyclic stress based on energy and structural damage caused by everyone is calculated. The research, fatigue life prediction of the key component on CII platform under random waves and flow loadings, has theoretical significance and value of engineering application.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

255-261

Citation:

Online since:

August 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Gough H J. Crystalline structure in relation to failure of metals-especially fatigue[C]∥Proceedings of the American Society for Testing and Materials 33, Part II. Philadelphia, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials, 1933: 3~22.

Google Scholar

[2] Lee S B. A criterion for fully reversed out-of-phase torsion and bending[M]. Milker K J, Brown M W. Multiaxial fatigue: ASTM SpecialTechnical Publication(STP) 853. Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials(ASTM), 1985: 553-568.

DOI: 10.1520/stp36242s

Google Scholar

[3] Findley W N. A theory for the effect of mean stress on fatigue of metals under combined torsion and axial load or bending [J]. Transaction ASME, J. Eng Ind., 1959, 81: 301-306.

DOI: 10.1115/1.4008329

Google Scholar

[4] McDiarmid D L. Ageneral criterion for high cycle multiaxial fatigue failure[J]. Fatigue Fract. EngngMater Struct., 1991, 14(4): 429-453.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2695.1991.tb00673.x

Google Scholar

[5] Papadopoulos I V. Long life fatigue undermultiaxial loading[J]. Int.J. Fatigue, 2001, 23: 839-849.

DOI: 10.1016/s0142-1123(01)00059-7

Google Scholar

[6] Garud Y S. A new approach to the evaluation of fatigue under multiaxial loadings[J]. Transaction ASME,J. Eng. Mater. Tech., 1981, 103: 118-125.

DOI: 10.1115/1.3224982

Google Scholar

[7] Glinka G, Shen G, Plumtree A. Amultiaxial fatigue strain energy density parameter related to the critical fracture plane[J]. Fatigue Frac. Eng. Mater. Struct., 1995, 18(1): 37-46.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2695.1995.tb00140.x

Google Scholar

[8] Liu Y M, Mahadevan S. Multiaxial high-cycle fatigue criterion and life prediction for metals[J]. Int.J. Fatigue, 2005(27): 790-800.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.01.003

Google Scholar

[9] Shang Deguang, Yao Weixing, Wang Dejun, Zhou Zhige. Multiaxial fatigue life prediction model based on shear[J]. Journal of Mechanical Strength, 1999, 21(2): 141-144.

Google Scholar

[10] Botshekan M, Degallaix S, Desplanques Y, et al. Tensileand LCF properties of AISI 316LN SS at 300 and 77 K[J]. Fatigue Fracture of Engineering Material Structures, 1998, 21(6): 651-660.

DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-2695.1998.00058.x

Google Scholar

[11] Luo Yunrong, Wang Qingyuan, Liu Yongjie, Huang Chongxiang. Low cycle fatigue properties of Q235 and Q345[J]. Journal of Sichuan University, (2012).

Google Scholar

[12] Wu Gang. Numerical simulation of fatigue damage based on energy criterion[D]. Guangxi University, (2006).

Google Scholar

[13] Zhao Yongxiang, Yang Bing. Monte Carlo modification of imperfect probabilistic fitigue S-N curves[J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2011, 47(12): 170-174.

DOI: 10.3901/jme.2011.12.170

Google Scholar