Optimization of Condensate Fractionation Unit Using Response Surface Methodology

Article Preview

Abstract:

Response Surface Method involving central composite design is employed to determine the optimal configuration of nine factors for maximizing the profit of a Condensate Fractionation Unit. When compared with the results from the base case and Taguchi method, the result from RSM shows higher profits by 33.1% and 1.16%, respectively. A further benefit of 0.64% is noticed when three insignificant factors were removed from the nine-factor experiment due to interactions between factors.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

462-465

Citation:

Online since:

September 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Yusoff, N., Ramasamy, M., &Yusup, S. (2011). Taguchi's Parametric Design Approach for the Selection of Optimization Variables in a Refrigerated Gas Plant. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 89, 665-675.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cherd.2010.09.021

Google Scholar

[2] Ali. S. F, Yusoff. N, Saibal Ganguly, Z. A Mardhati, Siraj. Khairiyah (2013). Profit Maximization of a Crude Distillation Unit. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Process Systems Engineering (PSE ASIA), (pp.313-319). Kuala Lumpur.

Google Scholar

[3] Lee, Yusoff. N, Ali. S.F. (2013). Taguchi's Parametric Design Approach for Determining the Significant Decision Variables in a Condensate Fractionation Unit. Bandar Seri Iskandar, Perak, Malaysia.

Google Scholar

[4] Gabriella Dellino, Jack P.C. Kleijnen, CarloMeloni (2008). Robust optimization in simulation: Taguchi and Response Surface Methodology. Int. J. Production Economics 125 (10), 52–59. doi: 10. 1016/j. ijpe. 2009. 12. 003.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.12.003

Google Scholar

[5] G.E. Box and N. R. Draper (2007), Response Surfaces, Mixtures and Ridge Analysis, 2nd Edition John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey.

Google Scholar

[6] Andre I. Khudri. John A. Cornell (1996), Response Surfaces, Design and Analyses, 2nd Edition Marcel Dekker, New York.

Google Scholar

[7] Myers, Raymond H. and Montgomery, Douglas C. 1995. Response SurfaceMethodology: process improvement with steepest ascent, the analysis of responseSurfaces, experimental designs for fitting response surfaces, 183-351. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

Google Scholar

[8] Box, E.P. George, Hunter, J. Stuart, and Hunter, G. William. 2005. Statistics for Experiments. New Jersey: John Willey and Sons, Inc.

Google Scholar