Removal of Amines from Wastewater Using Membrane Separation Processes

Article Preview

Abstract:

Natural gas is one of the energy sources in the world. It consists of predominantly methane (CH4), ethane (C2H6), ethylene (C2H4), propane (C3H8) butane (C4H10), pentane (C5H12) and some impurities particularly hydrogen sulfide (H2S) and carbon dioxide (CO2) that need to be treated prior utilized. Amine solution such as diisopropanolamine (DIPA) is used to remove the CO2 and H2S in natural gas processing. However a small amount of amines losses in some unit operations causing amines discharged into the effluent wastewater. The objective of this study are to investigate the flux of water and permeate, and rejection of DIPA solution across reverse osmosis, nanofiltration and ultrafiltration membrane which known as AFC99, AFC40 and CA202 respectively. This paper studies the effect of cross-flow velocity on permeate flux and the effect of feed concentration on observed rejection of DIPA solution across AFC99, AFC40 and CA202 over the operating pressure. The results showed a significant role of cross-flow velocity on membrane performance from aspect flux obtained and phenomenon of concentration polarization that would increase the transport resistance of permeate flow. The highest flux can be achieved by high cross-flow velocity. While for rejection study, rejection of all membranes increase with increase of pressure yet decrease with concentration.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

639-643

Citation:

Online since:

September 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] A.W. Mohammad, N. Hilal, H. Al-Zoubi, & N.A. Darwish, Prediction of permeate fluxes and rejections of highly concentrated salts in nanofiltration membranes. Journal of membrane science, 289 (2007) 40-50.

DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2006.11.035

Google Scholar

[2] D.P. Hagewiesche, S.S. Ashour, H.A. Al-Ghawas and O.C. Sandall, Absorption of carbon dioxide into aqueous blends of monoethanolamine and N-methyldiethanolamine. Journal of Chemical Engineering Science. 50 (1994) 1071-1079.

DOI: 10.1016/0009-2509(94)00489-e

Google Scholar

[3] H. Al-Zoubi, N. Hilal, N.A. Darwish, & A.W. Mohammad, Rejection and modelling of sulphate and potassium salts by nanofiltration membranes: neural network and Spiegler–Kedem model. Desalination, 206 (2007) 42-60.

DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2006.02.060

Google Scholar

[4] H.H.P. Fang and S.H.K. Chien, Reverse osmosis separation of polar organic compound in aqueous solution. Environ. Sci. Technol. 10 (1976) 364-369.

DOI: 10.1021/es60115a011

Google Scholar

[5] J. W. Nam, J. Y. Park, J. H. Kim, S. Kwon, K. Chon, E. J. Lee, H.S. Kim and A. Jang, The evaluation on concentration polarization for effective monitoring of membrane fouling in seawater reverse osmosis membrane system. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry. (2013).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jiec.2013.10.012

Google Scholar

[6] L. Dumee, C. Scholes, G. Stevens and S. Kentish, Purification of aqueous amine solvents used in post combustion CO2Capture: A review. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control. 10 (2012) 443-455.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.07.005

Google Scholar

[7] M.A. Zazouli, S. Nasseri, A.H. Mahvi, M. Gholami, A.R. Mesdaghinia and M. Younesian, Retention of humic acid from water by nanofiltration membrane and influence of solution chemistry on membrane performance. Iran Journal Environmental Health Science Engineering. 5 (2008).

Google Scholar

[8] M.H. Al-Malack, and G.K. Anderson, Use of crossflow microfiltration in wastewater treatment. Water Research, 31(1997), 3064-3072.

DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1354(96)00084-x

Google Scholar

[9] M. Lopez, S. Alvarez, F.A. Riera, & R. Alvarez, Production of low alcohol content apple cider by reverse osmosis. Industrial & engineering chemistry research, 41(2002) 6600-6606.

DOI: 10.1021/ie020155a

Google Scholar

[10] N. Hilal, H. Al-Zoubi, A. W. Mohammad, & N. A. Darwish, Nanofiltration of highly concentrated salt solutions up to seawater salinity. Desalination 184 (2005) 315-326.

DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2005.02.062

Google Scholar

[11] R. Jiraratananon, A. Chanachai, R. Y. M. Huang and D. Uttapap, Pervaporation dehydration of ethanol–water mixtures with chitosan/hydroxyethylcellulose (CS/HEC) composite membranes: I. Effect of operating conditions. Journal of membrane science. 195 (2002).

DOI: 10.1016/s0376-7388(01)00563-4

Google Scholar

[12] S. Bhattacharjee, A.S. Kim, and M. Elimelech, Concentration polarization of interacting solute particles in cross-flow membrane filtration. Journal of Colloid and interface Science, 212(1999) 81-99.

DOI: 10.1006/jcis.1998.6045

Google Scholar

[13] S. Shirazi, C.J. Lin, and D. Chen, Inorganic fouling of pressure-driven membrane processes - a critical review. Desalination. 250(2010) 236-248.

DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2009.02.056

Google Scholar

[14] S. Srisurichan, R. Jiraratananon and A.G. Fane, Mass transfer mechanisms and transport resistances in direct contact membrane distillation process. Journal of Membrane Science. 277 (2006) 186-194.

DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2005.10.028

Google Scholar