Research on the Knowledge Character and Classification of Intangible Cultural Heritage

Article Preview

Abstract:

As the knowledge of intangible cultural heritage is the experience which is accumulated for a long time, it is difficult to express the complex relationships completely. In order to preserve the content of intangible cultural heritage effectively, the knowledge should be classified by a rational standard. Firstly, this paper discussed the special character and information processing technology of intangible culture heritage; Secondly, the classification of intangible cultural heritage is designed based on its character and the theory of knowledge classification, and then a knowledge modeling framework for intangible cultural heritage is designed based on this classification. Application has proved that it is feasible and effective, and could help the users to master the knowledge and its relationship from various perspectives.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

153-158

Citation:

Online since:

September 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] http: /baike. baidu. com/view/11090. htm?fr=ala0_1_1.

Google Scholar

[2] Bingan Wu, The Protection of "cultural space" about Intangible Cultural Inheritance, Qinghai Social Sciences, Jan. 2007, pp.33-36, 41.

Google Scholar

[3] Cheng Yang, Research and Design of Ontology-Based Digital Museum Model of Immovable Cultural Relic, 2007, Master Degree Thesis, Zhejiang University.

Google Scholar

[4] Guoxin Tan, Chuanming Sun, Zheng Zhong. Knowledge Representation of Funeral Dance, based on CIDOC CRM. 2009 Second International Symposium on Knowledge Acquisition and Modeling, 2009, pp.39-42.

DOI: 10.1109/kam.2009.163

Google Scholar

[5] http: /en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Principal_component_analysis.

Google Scholar

[6] Dongming Lu, Yunhe Pan. Digital preservation for heritages: technologies and applications, 2009, 24-25.

Google Scholar

[7] Dongming Lu, Yunhe Pan. Digital preservation for heritages: technologies and applications, 2009, 140-141.

Google Scholar

[8] Allie, Toward a pragmatic taxonomy of knowledge maps : classification principles, sample typologies and application examples, Proc of the 10th International Conference on Information Visualization, 2006, 337-348.

DOI: 10.1109/iv.2006.111

Google Scholar

[9] Polanyi, Fernndez LpezM, 2003, WebODE in a nutshell Ⅱ. AI Magazine , 24(3): 37-48.

Google Scholar

[10] Nonaka, Dieter Fensel, Frank Van Harmelen, 2003, Towards The Semantic Web-Ontology-Driven Knowledge Management. West Sussex, England; John Wiley&Sons Ltd, 364-378.

DOI: 10.1002/0470858060.ch15

Google Scholar

[11] Nonaka, Takeuchi, 2006, Developing an OWL Ontology for E-Tourism. In: Semantic Web Services, Processes and Applications. Springer, Heidelberg, 137-143.

Google Scholar

[12] Hedlund eta., 2004, Creating a Virtual Audience for the Heritage of Ancient Theatres and Odes, VSMM, 537-441.

Google Scholar

[13] Inkpen, Miguel-Angel Sicilia, 2008, On Linking Cultural Spaces and e-Tourism: An Ontology-Based Approach. M.D. Lytras et al. (Eds. ): WSKS, 237-240.

Google Scholar

[14] Badaracco, Sophia Ananiadou, Katsumori Matsushima, 2006, Terminology based Knowledge Mining for New Knowledge Discovery, 74-88.

Google Scholar

[15] Parry R., 2005, Digital Heritage and the rise of theory in museum computing, 20: 333-348.

Google Scholar

[16] The Intangible cultural heritage in China, http: /www. ihchina. cn/main. jsp.

Google Scholar

[17] http: /tech. 163. com/04/1028/11/13PD93VB0009rt. html.

Google Scholar