Research on Relative Reducts of Rough Set Model in Consistent and Inconsistent Decision Tables

Article Preview

Abstract:

Z. Pawlak’s classical rough set theory has been widely applied in analyzing ordinary information systems and decision tables. In this theory, a relative reduct can be considered as a minimum set of attributes that preserves a certain classification property. This paper investigates three different classification properties, and proposes three distinct definitions accordingly. According to the three classification properties, we can define three distinct definitions respectively. Based on the common structure of the specific definitions of relative reducts and discernibility matrices, general definitions of relative reducts and discernibility matrices are suggested.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1590-1606

Citation:

Online since:

September 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Z. Pawlak, Rough sets, International Journal of Computer and Information Sciences 11 (1982), p.341–356.

Google Scholar

[2] Q.H. Hu, Z.X. Xie, D.R. Yu, Hybrid attribute reduction based on a novel fuzzy-rough model and information granulation, Pattern Recognition Letters 40 (2007), p.3509–3521.

DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2007.03.017

Google Scholar

[3] X.H. Hu, N. Cercone, Learning in relational databases: a rough set approach, Computational Intelligence 11 (1995), p.323–338.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8640.1995.tb00035.x

Google Scholar

[4] Z. Pawlak, Rough Sets: Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning About Data, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, (1991).

Google Scholar

[5] A. Skowron, C. Rauszer, The discernibility matrices and functions in information systems, in: R. Slowin' ski (Ed. ), Intelligent Decision Support, Handbook of Applications and Advances of the Rough Sets Theory, Kluwer, Dordrecht, (1992).

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-015-7975-9_21

Google Scholar

[6] D. Slezak, Approximate reducts in decision tables, Proceedings of Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty (1996), p.1159–1164.

Google Scholar

[7] J. Wang, D.Q. Miao, Analysis on attribute reduction strategies of rough set, Chinese Journal of Computer Science and Technology 13 (1998), p.189–192.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02946606

Google Scholar

[8] J. Wang, J. Wang, Reduction algorithms based on discernibility matrix: the ordered attributes method, Journal of Computer Science and Technology 16 (2001), p.489–504.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02943234

Google Scholar

[9] W.Z. Wu, M. Zhang, H.Z. Li, J.S. Mi, Knowledge reduction in random information systems via Dempster–Shafer theory of evidence, Information Sciences 174 (2005), p.143–164.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2004.09.002

Google Scholar

[10] W.X. Zhang, J.S. Mi, W.Z. Wu, Knowledge reduction in inconsistent information systems, Chinese Journal of Computers 1 (2003), p.12–18.

Google Scholar

[11] K. Zhao, J. Wang, A reduction algorithm meeting users' requirements, Journal of Computer Science and Technology 17 (2002), p.578–593.

Google Scholar

[12] G.Y. Wang, Calculation methods for core attributes of decision table, Chinese Journal of Computers 26 (2003), p.611–615. in Chinese.

Google Scholar

[13] M. Yang, Z.H. Sun, Improvement of discernibility matrix and the computation of a core, Journal of Fudan University (Natural Science) 43 (2004), p.865–868. in Chinese.

Google Scholar

[14] Y.Y. Yao, Y. Zhao, Discernibility matrix simplification for constructing attribute reducts, Information Sciences 179 (7) (2009), p.867–882.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2008.11.020

Google Scholar

[15] D.Y. Ye, Z.J. Chen, An improved discernibility matrix for computing all reducts of an inconsistent decision table, The Proceedings of the Fifth IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Informatics (2006), p.305–308.

DOI: 10.1109/coginf.2006.365511

Google Scholar

[16] M. Kryszkiewicz, Comparative study of alternative types of knowledge reduction in inconsistent systems, International Journal of Intelligent Systems 16 (2001), p.105–120.

DOI: 10.1002/1098-111x(200101)16:1<105::aid-int8>3.0.co;2-s

Google Scholar

[17] J.S. Mi, W.Z. Wu, W.X. Zhang, Approaches to knowledge reduction based on variable precision rough set model, Information Sciences 159 (2004), p.255–272.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2003.07.004

Google Scholar

[18] D. Slezak, Normalized decision functions and measures for inconsistent decision tables analysis, Fundamenta Informaticae 44 (2000), p.291–319.

Google Scholar

[19] G.Y. Wang, J. Zhao, J. Wu, A comparitive study of algebra viewpoint and information viewpoint in attribute reduction, Foundamenta Informaticae 68 (2005), p.1–13.

Google Scholar

[20] Y. Zhao, Y.Y. Yao, F. Luo, Data analysis based on discernibility and indiscernibility, Information Sciences 177 (2007), p.4959–4976.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2007.06.031

Google Scholar

[21] A. Skowron, Boolean reasoning for decision rules generation, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Methodologies for Intelligent Systems (1993), p.295–305.

DOI: 10.1007/3-540-56804-2_28

Google Scholar

[22] Y.Y. Yao, Decision-theoretic rough set models, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Rough Sets and Knowledge Technology LNAI 4481 (2007), p.1–12.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-72458-2_1

Google Scholar

[23] T. Beaubouef, F.E. Petry, G. Arora, Information-theoretic measures of uncertainty for rough sets and rough relational databases, Information Sciences 109 (1998), p.185–195.

DOI: 10.1016/s0020-0255(98)00019-x

Google Scholar

[24] Q.H. Hu, D.R. Yu, Z.X. Xie, Information-preserving hybrid data reduction based on fuzzy-rough techniques, Pattern Recognition Letters 27 (2006), p.414–423.

DOI: 10.1016/j.patrec.2005.09.004

Google Scholar

[25] R. Susmaga, Reducts and constructs in attribute reduction, Fundamenta Informaticae 61 (2) (2004), p.159–181.

Google Scholar

[26] I. Düntsch, G. Gediga, Uncertainty measures of rough set prediction, Artificial Intelligence 106 (1998), p.77–107.

DOI: 10.1016/s0004-3702(98)00091-5

Google Scholar

[27] J. Klir, M.J. Wierman, Uncertainty Based Information: Elements of Generalized Information Theory, Physica-Verlag, New York (1999).

Google Scholar

[28] J.Y. Liang, Z.Z. Shi, The information entropy, rough entropy and knowledge granulation in rough set theory, International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems 12 (2004), p.37–46.

DOI: 10.1142/s0218488504002631

Google Scholar

[29] M.J. Wierman, Measuring uncertainty in rough set theory, International Journal of General Systems 28 (1999), p.283–297.

DOI: 10.1080/03081079908935239

Google Scholar

[30] Y.Y. Yao, Y. Zhao, Attribute reduction in decision-theoretic rough set models, Information Sciences 178 (2008), p.3356–3373.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2008.05.010

Google Scholar

[31] Y. Zhao, F. Luo, S.K.M. Wong, Y.Y. Yao, A general definition of an attribute reduct, Proceedings of the Second Rough Sets and Knowledge Technology (2007), p.101–108.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-72458-2_12

Google Scholar

[32] D.Q. Miao, J. Zhou, N. Zhang, N. Feng, R.Z. Wang, Research of attribute reduction based on algebraic equations, Acta Electronica Sinica, accepted for publication. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[33] S.H. Nguyen, H.S. Nguyen, Some efficient algorithms for rough set methods, Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty on Knowledge Based Systems (1996), p.1451–1456.

Google Scholar