CFD Modeling of Hydrogen Releases and Dispersion in the Exhaust Pipe of Rocket Tank

Article Preview

Abstract:

The dispersion process of hydrogen leaking from the exhaust pipe of rocket tank is analyzed with numerical simulations in order to assess hazards and associated risks of a leakage accident in the present study. The temporal and spatial evolution of the hydrogen concentration at the different tank pressures is predicted numerically. The results show that when the tank pressure is 0.35MPa, the farthest dispersion distance of flammable region in the horizontal direction is 156m within 15s of leakage, simultaneously, the vertical distance upward is 80m and the vertical distance downward is 51m. Additionally, due to the assumption that the tank pressure is constant, the leakage rate is constant and extremely high, buoyancy can’t impel completely hydrogen clouds to diffusion upward. The present numerical results can be useful to analyze safety issues in the aerospace field.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1764-1768

Citation:

Online since:

September 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Hijikata T. Research and development of international clean energy network using hydrogen energy (WE-NET)[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2002, 27(2): 115-129.

DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3199(01)00089-1

Google Scholar

[2] Chitose K, Takeno K, Yamada Y, et al. Activities on hydrogen safety for the WE-NET project–experiment and simulation of the hydrogen dispersion[C]/Proceedings of the 13th World Hydrogen Energy Conference. (2000).

Google Scholar

[3] Venetsanos A G, Bartzis J G. CFD modeling of large-scale LH2 spills in open environment[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2007, 32(13): 2171-2177.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.04.020

Google Scholar

[4] Middha P, Ichard M, Arntzen B J. Validation of CFD modelling of LH2 spread and evaporation against large-scale spill experiments[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2011, 36(3): 2620-2627.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.03.122

Google Scholar

[5] Witcofski R D. Dispersion of flammable clouds resulting from large spills of liquid hydrogen[C]. 1981: 284-208.

Google Scholar

[6] Goldwire H C, Morris L K, Kamppinen L, et al. Coyote series data report, LLNL/NWC, LNG spill tests[J]. Livermore, California: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, (1983).

Google Scholar

[7] Statharas J C, Venetsanos A G, Bartzis J G, et al. Analysis of data from spilling experiments performed with liquid hydrogen[J]. Journal of hazardous materials, 2000, 77(1): 57-75.

DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3894(00)00252-1

Google Scholar

[8] Hanna S R, Hansen O R, Dharmavaram S. FLACS CFD air quality model performance evaluation with Kit Fox, MUST, Prairie Grass, and EMU observations[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2004, 38(28): 4675-4687.

DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.05.041

Google Scholar

[9] Swain M R, Filoso P A, Swain M N. An experimental investigation into the ignition of leaking hydrogen[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2007, 32(2): 287-295.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.06.041

Google Scholar

[10] Zhang Shi-shuai. Computational fluid dynamics and its applications[M]. Huazhong University of Science and Technology press, (2011).

Google Scholar