Assessment and Response of UAV Development

Article Preview

Abstract:

With large number of participants, tight development time, high technical standards, there is great uncertainty and risk during doing researching on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV for short). This article makes a count on the accidents’ data of the past 30 years and analyses the causes of these accidents, thus creating the comprehensive risk evaluation index system of the research on UAV. Based on analytic hierarchy process, the paper builds comprehensive Risk Assessment model and discusses the Risk Response System during the research on UAV to guide specific practices of Risk Management of UAV project.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

6269-6273

Citation:

Online since:

September 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Ogunlana,S. O, Chareonngam,C. M T. Planning strategy and risk management for a high-risk project. Engineering Magazine. (1995).

Google Scholar

[2] Zeng J, Wei F, Liu A. Employing Latent Dirichlet Allocation for Organizational Risk Identification[J]. Journal of Convergence Information Technology, 2011, 6(12).

Google Scholar

[3] Liu Anying, Wei Fajie. Risk Analysis with Incomplete Information Based on Prospect Theory[C]. The 10th International Conference Industrial Management, Beijing, September 16-18, 2010, 674-678.

Google Scholar

[4] Dorota Kuchta. Use of fuzzy numbers in project risk (criticality) assessment[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2001(19):305—310.

DOI: 10.1016/s0263-7863(00)00022-3

Google Scholar

[5] Stamatelatos M, Dezfuli H, Apostolakis G, et al. Probabilistic risk assessment procedures guide for NASA managers and practitioners[J]. (2011).

Google Scholar

[6] Reason J T, Reason J T. Managing the risks of organizational accidents[M]. Aldershot: Ashgate, (1997).

Google Scholar

[7] Gaudenzi B, Borghesi A. Managing risks in the supply chain using the AHP method[J]. International Journal of Logistics Management, The, 2006, 17(1): 114-136.

DOI: 10.1108/09574090610663464

Google Scholar

[8] Kontio J. A case study in applying a systematic method for COTS selection[C]/Software Engineering, 1996., Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on. IEEE, 1996: 201-209.

DOI: 10.1109/icse.1996.493416

Google Scholar

[9] PMBoK A. Guide to the project Management body of knowledge[J]. Project Management Institute, Pennsylvania USA, (2000).

Google Scholar