A Contribution to Assessment of Transportation Structures Vulnerability

Article Preview

Abstract:

The paper brings the results of a general analysis dealing with the possibility that a vehicle can be misused for an intended attack on selected transportation structures. A vehicle driving at a high speed and crashing into a bridge column intentionally was the basic analyzed scenario of the attack. Based on the analysis of the technical parameters of available vehicles we have set the values of basic parameters characterizing the vehicle crash into a bridge column. The results of the accomplished quantitative analysis can be used for evaluating the vulnerability of specific transportation structures.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

588-596

Citation:

Online since:

October 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] J. Stodola, Z. Jamrichova, Knowledge engineering, University of Defence, Brno, (2012).

Google Scholar

[2] M. Huang, Vehicle Crash Mechanics, CRC Press, Bocca Raton, (2002).

Google Scholar

[3] A. Bradac at. al., Forensic engineering, CERM, Brno, (1999).

Google Scholar

[4] H. Franck, D. Franck, Mathematical Methods for Accident Reconstruction: A Forensic Engineering Perspective, CRC Press, Bocca Raton, (2009).

Google Scholar

[5] Fifth Gear Team, Crash Test Ford Focus 120 mph (190 km/h), YouTube video, November 25, 2011, https: /www. youtube. com/watch?v=LmRkPyuet_o.

Google Scholar

[6] Directive 96/79/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1996 on the protection of occupants of motor vehicles in the event of a frontal impact and amendment of Directive 70/156/EEC, Official journal of the European Communities, 1997, No. L 18/7.

Google Scholar

[7] Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards - Part 571 – Crashworthiness, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washigton, (1999).

Google Scholar

[8] EURO NCAP, The Tests Explained – Frontal Impact, accessed July 27, 2014, http: /www. euroncap. com/tests/frontimpact. aspx.

Google Scholar

[9] SD-STD-02. 01, Revision A, Cerification Standard - Test Method for Vehicle Crash Testing of Perimeter Barriers and Gates, U.S. Deparment of State, Washington, (2003).

Google Scholar

[10] H. Du, P. Ye, D. Wang, et al., Study on Accuracy Improvement of Vehicle Crash Simulation Considering Stamping Effects, Advanced Materials Research, vol. 139-141 (2011), pp.532-535.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.139-141.532

Google Scholar

[11] Y. Liu, Development and evaluation of a finite element truck chassis crash model, International Journal of Crashworthiness, vol. 15 (2010), No. 1, pp.107-113.

DOI: 10.1080/13588260903047697

Google Scholar

[12] I.A. Harmati, A. Rovid, P. Varlaki, VIDApproximation of Force and Energy in Vehicle Crash Using LPV Type Description, WSEAS Transactions on Systems, vol. 9 (2010), No. 7, pp.734-743.

Google Scholar

[13] Y. Liu, Development and evaluation of a finite element truck chassis crash model, International Journal of Crashworthiness, vol. 15 (2010), No. 1, pp.107-113.

DOI: 10.1080/13588260903047697

Google Scholar

[14] Down the Tube, Crash Barrier Tests, YouTube video, June 30, 2007, https: /www. youtube. com/watch?v=h-pVT97rtI.

Google Scholar

[15] A. German et. al., Crash Pulse Data From Event Data Recorders In Rigid Barrier Tests, in: 22nd International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, U.S. Department of Transportation – National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, 2011, pp.1-12.

Google Scholar

[16] A. German et. al., Event Data Recorders in the Analysis of Frontal Impacts, Annual Proceedings – Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine, vol. 51 (2007), pp.225-243.

Google Scholar

[17] J.L. Comeau, A. German, D. Floyd, Comparison of Crash Pulse Data from Motor Vehicle Event Data Recorders and Laboratory Instrumentation, in: Proceedings of the Canadian Multidisciplinary Road Safety Conference XIV, Canadian Association of Road Safety Professionals, Ottawa, 2004, pp.1-17.

Google Scholar

[18] Bational Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Vehicle Crash Test Database, accessed June 27, 2014, http: /www-nrd. nhtsa. dot. gov/database/veh/veh. htm.

Google Scholar

[19] U. Bjornstig, J. Bjornstig, A. Eriksson, Passenger car collision fatalities - with special emphasis on collisions with heavy vehicles, Accident Analysis and Prevention, vol. 40 (2008), No. 1, pp.158-166.

DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2007.05.003

Google Scholar

[20] Heald, 30 tonne truck Vehicle Barricade Road blocker HCR4M1200RB at MIRA FODEN impact test, YouTube video, June 23, 2009, http: /www. youtube. com/watch?v=stsb9f3UuGE.

Google Scholar

[21] PRO Barrier Engineering LCC, Arrestor Crash Test October 27, 2005, accessed July 6, 2014, http: /www. probarrier. com/page. aspx?id=12.

Google Scholar

[22] Futurenet Security Solutions, SW1900 Wedge Barrier - Crash Test, YouTube video, August 16, 2011, https: /www. youtube. com/watch?v=9wPliTkBR48.

Google Scholar

[23] Heald, PAS 68 800mm Roadblocker, accessed July 6, 2014, http: /www. heald. uk. com/pas68-800mm-roadblocker-overview. htm?l=25.

Google Scholar

[24] Heald, Heald HCR4M 1200RB PAS 68 & K1 Test American Truck, accessed July 6, 2014, http: /www. heald. uk. com/pas68-k12-roadblocker-videos. htm?l=23.

Google Scholar

[25] Bakers Fancing, INTERCEPTOR - the ultimate defence against hostile attack, accessed July 6, 2014, http: /www. barkersfencing. com/interceptor. htm.

Google Scholar