Creative Design for Skin and Shape Using Advanced CAD Systems

Article Preview

Abstract:

Design for X (DfX) is a methodology for the definition and implementation of a range of goals which allow the development of an optimal product based on a series of aspects i.e. manufacturing, assembly, reliability, usability, ergonomics. A great amount of research work has been implemented towards improving a product that is designed using different aspects of the design process as a criterion for optimization. The proposed Design for Skin & Shape methodology (DfS&S) is focusing towards the design of creative products and packages, based on a shape and graphic texture that clarifies directly in the customer mind what is the product on the selves. At the same time, it creates a clear optical identity to its mind for the product which is directly associated with the design. An additional advantage of the DfS&S is that it can reduce the product development time since the concept is defined from the beginning of the design cycle. A number of case studies are presented.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1021-1025

Citation:

Online since:

October 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] N. Bilalis, E. Maravelakis, Analysing the dependencies between the innovation attributes in NPD using Design Structure Matrix – the I-DSM tool, International Journal of Product Development 3 (3/4) (2006) 432-446.

DOI: 10.1504/ijpd.2006.009902

Google Scholar

[2] D. M. Anderson, Design for Manufacturability: How to Use Concurrent Engineering to Rapidly Develop Low-Cost, High-Quality Products for Lean Production, Productivity Press, (2014).

DOI: 10.1201/b16501

Google Scholar

[3] M.V. Martin, K. Ishii, Design For Variety: Development Of Complexity Indices And Design Charts, Proceedings of DETC '97 (ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences September 14 – 17), Sacramento, (1997).

DOI: 10.1115/detc97/dfm-4359

Google Scholar

[4] P. Singh, P. Sandborn, Obsolescence driven design refresh planning for sustainment dominated systems, The Engineering Economist 51(2) (2006) 115-139.

DOI: 10.1080/00137910600695643

Google Scholar

[5] R.G. Cooper, Winning at New Products: Accelerating the Process from Idea to Launch, 3rd edition, Perseus Books, Cambridge, (2001).

Google Scholar

[6] H. Mather, Design for logistics (DfL)-The next challenge for designers, Production and Inventory Management Journal 3(1) (1992) 77–121.

Google Scholar

[7] S. Dowlatshahi, Role of logistics in concurrent engineering, International Journal of Production Economics 44(3) (1996) 189-199.

DOI: 10.1016/0925-5273(96)00173-9

Google Scholar