Influence of Minimum Quantity Cooling Lubrication (MQCL) on Chip Formation Zone Factors and Shearing Force in Turning AISI 1045 Steel

Article Preview

Abstract:

The paper presents the results of research on the effect produced by various cooling methods on the chip thickness ratio, shear angle and shearing force. Dry cutting, cooling by compressed air and the MinimumQuantityCoolingLubrication (MQCL) method when finish turning of carbon steel with different speeds of cutting and feed rates were compared. The investigations were performed in accordance with the Parameter Space Investigation method. The advantage of the MQCL is confirmed by lower values of the chip thickening ratio, shearing force and higher values of the shear angle. Depending on the cutting conditions, the efficiency of the MQCL method is 6 to 30% higher compared to dry machining.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

43-47

Citation:

Online since:

October 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] V.N. Gaitonde, S.R. Karnik, J. Paolo Davim, Selection of optimal MQL and cutting conditions for enhancing machinability in turning of brass, J. of Mat. Proc. Tech. 204 (2008) 459-464.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.11.193

Google Scholar

[2] P.I. Jashcheritsyn, E.E. Feldshtein, M.A. Kornievich, Theory of cutting, New Knoledge, Mińsk, 2006 (in Russian).

Google Scholar

[3] E.M. Trent, P.K. Wright, Metal Cutting, fourth ed, Butterworth-Heinemann, Woburn, (2000).

Google Scholar

[4] V.P. Astakhov, Tribology of Metal Cutting, Elsevier Ltd, (2006).

Google Scholar

[5] A.S. Adnan, S. Subbiah, Experimental investigation of transverse vibration-assisted orthogonal cutting of AL-2024, Int. Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture. 50 (2010) 294-302.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2009.11.004

Google Scholar

[6] G. Germain, P. DalSanto, J.L. Lebrun Comprehension of chip formation in laser assisted machining, Int. Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture. 51 (2011) 230-238.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2010.11.006

Google Scholar

[7] V.P. Astakhov, Ecological Machining: Near-dry Machining, in: Machining. Fundamentals and Recent Advances, J. Paulo Davim (Ed. ), Springer-Verlag London Limited, (2008).

DOI: 10.1504/ijmmm.2010.036149

Google Scholar

[8] W. Grzesik, Advanced Machining Processes of Metallic Materials. Theory, Modelling and Applications, Elsevier, (2008).

Google Scholar

[9] D.P. Adler, W. W-S. Hii, D.J. Michalek, J.W. Sutherland, Examining the Role of Gutting Fluids and Efforts to Address Associated Enviromental/Health Concerns, Machining Science and Technology. 10, 1 (2006) 23-58.

DOI: 10.1080/10910340500534282

Google Scholar

[10] T. Konold, Maschinentechnik für die Trockenbearbeitung. VDI-Z, Integrierte Produktion. 4 (2001) 61-63.

Google Scholar

[11] G. Krolczyk, P. Nieslony, S. Legutko, Microhardness and Surface Integrity in Turning Process of Duplex Stainless Steel (DSS) for Different Cutting Conditions, Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance. 23, 3 (2014) 859-866.

DOI: 10.1007/s11665-013-0832-4

Google Scholar

[12] G. Krolczyk, S. Legutko, A. Stoic, Influence of cutting parameters and conditions onto surface hardness of duplex stainless steel after turning process, Tehnički Vjesnik. 20, 6 (2013) 1077-1080.

Google Scholar

[13] R.B. Statnikov, A. Statnikov, The Parameter Space Investigation Method Toolkit, Artech House, Boston/London, (2011).

Google Scholar

[14] V.P. Astakhov, J.C. Outeiro, Metal Cutting Mechanics, Finite Element Modelling, in: Machining. Fundamentals and Recent Advances, J. Paulo Davim (Ed. ), Springer-Verlag London Limited, (2008).

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-84800-213-5_1

Google Scholar

[15] H. Ernst, M.E. Merchant, Chip formation, friction and high quality machined surfaces, Surface Treatment Metals ASM. 29 (1941) 299-378.

Google Scholar