Realizing Lean Concept in Automotive Parts Production: Child Parts in Sub-Assembly Line

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper addresses the application of a promising and concept known as Lean Manufacturing (LM) concepts that can be used to prevent incorrect parts size at subassembly 1 and 5. In the context of size versus volume, the possibility of small parts to encounter defects is much greater compare to huge size. This undesirable circumstance will lead to the financial deficits in terms of waste. At this stage, this paper will identify and investigate the sources of inputs that cause the failure in the manufacturing system. The finding of the failure will be analysed and extending to the problem solution by suggesting the lean approach at the allocated area. By adapting some of this approach, it will deliver to the performance of production line that includes an assessment of fulfilling the objectives in terms of preventing parts incorrect size, reducing related cost from waste and providing customer with quality products. Taking into account of the objectives, the implementation of this approach in the sub assembly line is then described. Nevertheless, further investigations are necessary to improve the proposed applications which currently function with limitation due to small area of production line.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1015-1019

Citation:

Online since:

October 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] J.P. Womack, D.T. Jones and D. Roos, The Machine That Changed the World, Rawson Associates, New York, NY, (1990).

Google Scholar

[2] M. Poppendieck, Principles of lean thinking, Poppendieck. LLC, USA, (2002).

Google Scholar

[3] T. Melton, The benefits of lean manufacturing: what lean thinking has to offer the process industries. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 83(6) (2005) 662-673.

DOI: 10.1205/cherd.04351

Google Scholar

[4] R. Shah and P.T. Ward, Defining and developing measures of lean production, Journal of Operations Management, 25 (2007) 785-805.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jom.2007.01.019

Google Scholar

[5] J.P. Womack, D.T. Jones, Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation, Simon & Schuster, New York, USA, (1996).

DOI: 10.1038/sj.jors.2600967

Google Scholar

[6] T. Ohno, Toyota production system beyond large - Scale production. Productivity Press, Oregon, (1988).

Google Scholar

[7] M. Holweg, The genealogy of lean production. Journal of Operations Management, 25 (2007) 420–437.

Google Scholar

[8] A.P. Brunet, and S. New, Kaizen in Japan: An empirical study. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 23(12) (2003) 1426–1446.

DOI: 10.1108/01443570310506704

Google Scholar

[9] A. Tezel, L. Koskela, and P. Tzortzopoulos, The Functions of Visual Management, In Proceedings of the International Research Symposium, Salford, UK, (2009).

Google Scholar

[10] K. Suzaki, The New Shop Floor Management: Empowering People for Continuous Improvement, The Free Press, New York, (1993).

Google Scholar

[11] M. Imai, Gemba Kaizen: A Commonsense, Low-Cost Approach to Management, McGraw-Hill, London, (1997).

Google Scholar

[12] G.D. Galsworth, Visual Systems: Harnessing the Power of Visual Workplace, AMACOM, New York, (1997).

Google Scholar

[13] M. Greif, The Visual Factory: Building Participation through Shared Information, Productivity Press, Portland, (1991).

Google Scholar