Study on Treatment of Landfill Leachate Using an Integrated KMnO4 Oxidation and Diatomite Adsorption Method

Article Preview

Abstract:

This study focused on the performances of an integrated KMnO4 oxidation and diatomite adsorption method in the treatment of fresh landfill leachate. The optimal conditions and influential parameters for oxidation and adsorption were determined. The results showed that under optimum oxidation conditions for KMnO4, the removal rates of CODCr and ammonia nitrogen reached 46% and 32% respectively. And the removal rates of CODCr and ammonia nitrogen contained in leachate increased up to 98% and 90% after absorbed by diatomite.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

430-435

Citation:

Online since:

October 2014

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Bergendahl John: Journal of New England Water Environment Association, 38(2004)179-189.

Google Scholar

[2] Scott Jon P, Ollis David F: Environmental Progress, 14(1995) 88-103.

Google Scholar

[3] Zhu xiaojun, Lu qin, Zhou gongming et al: China Water & Wastewater, 21(2005)1-3.

Google Scholar

[4] Chen Buning, etal: Chemical Engineering Journal, 84(2001)77-94.

Google Scholar

[5] Glaze William H., Kang Joon-Wun: Science and Engineering, 9(1987)335-352.

Google Scholar

[6] Pohland E. G: AIChE Symposium Series, 71(1975) 308-318.

Google Scholar

[7] Tjasa G. Bulc: Ecological Engineering, 26(2006)365-374.

Google Scholar

[8] Yu ruilian, Hu gongren: Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 12(2003)73-75. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[9] Wang fei, Liao li, Wang songlin: Safety and Environmental Engineering, 12(2005)35-40.

Google Scholar

[10] Deng yansheng, Deng dongfeng: Energy Environmental Protection, 20(2006)30-32.

Google Scholar

[11] Pirbazari M, et a1: Water Res, 30(1996)2691-2706.

Google Scholar

[12] Cecillia O man, per-A ke Hynning: Environmental Pollution, 80(1993)265-271.

Google Scholar

[13] Nancy Ragle, John Kissel: Water Environment Research, 67(1995)238-243.

Google Scholar

[14] Carley B N, Mavinic D S: Water Research, 63(1991)51-59.

Google Scholar

[15] Taina H. Hoilijoki, Riitta H. Kettunen: Water Research., 34(2000)1435-1446.

Google Scholar

[16] Shiskowski D. M, et al: Water Res. 32(1998)2533-2541.

Google Scholar

[17] Sletten R.S. et al: Water Research, 29(1995)2376-2386.

Google Scholar

[18] M. Sinan Bilgili, Ahmet Demir: Journal of Hazardous Materials, 24(2006)1-9.

Google Scholar

[19] Joar Karsten Q ygard, Amund Mage: Water Research, 38(2004)2851-2858.

Google Scholar

[20] Kesson M A, Nilsson P: Journal of Environmental Engineering, 10(1997)892-900.

Google Scholar

[21] Robison H D, Barber C: Pollution Control, 81(1982)46-478.

Google Scholar

[22] G.E. Schrab, K.W. Brown: Water, Air and Soil Pollution, 69(1993)99-112.

Google Scholar

[23] D. Geenens: Water Science and Technology, 44 (1999)359-36.

Google Scholar

[24] Sundaravadivel M., Vigneswaran S: Science and Technology, 31(2001)351-409.

Google Scholar