Validation of the Developed Multi-Gas Monitoring System

Crystalynne D. Cortez

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.666.245

Paper Titles

Moving Object Tracking Using Multiple Views and Data Association
p.226

Proper Features Extraction from the Multiple Sclerosis Disease Postural Disorders for Decision Support System Definition
p.230

A Study on Regression Model Using Response Surface Methodology
p.235

Investigation of Threading Building Blocks Framework on Real Time Visual Object Tracking Algorithm
p.240

Validation of the Developed Multi-Gas Monitoring System
p.245

Facial Prediction and Recognition Using Wavelets Transform Algorithm and Technique
p.251

Vibration Monitoring Using Wavelets Transform Feature Extraction Algorithm and Technique
p.256

Detection of Amaranthus palmeri sp. Seedlings in Vegetable Farms Using Genetic Algorithm Optimized Support Vector Machine
p.267

Railway Track Irregularity Data Mining and Time Series Trend Forecasting Research
p.272

HomeApplied Mechanics and MaterialsApplied Mechanics and Materials Vol. 666Validation of the Developed Multi-Gas Monitoring...

Validation of the Developed Multi-Gas Monitoring System

Abstract:

The study was a validation of a developed gas monitoring system. The objective of the study was to determine the accuracy of the prototype in identifying gas concentrations. Experimental research method was utilized in the study. In evaluating the system’s ability to sense carbon monoxide, toluene, methane, liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), smoke and ammonia, three trials tests using cigarette smoke, kitchen lighter gas and aromatic spirit of ammonia were conducted. The device was found to be sensitive with toluene, ammonia, smoke, carbon monoxide, LPG and methane. The system attained the accuracy of 90.10% in detecting LPG and 97.32% for methane using kitchen lighter gas test; 79.81% for carbon monoxide and 80% for smoke using the cigarette smoke test; and 85.54% for ammonia and 71.93% for toluene. In addition, an accuracy of 95.39% was attained as the device was compared to the reading of an existing PETC device in measuring carbon monoxide.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Electronics, Mechatronics and Automation III

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volume 666)

Pages:

245-250

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.666.245

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

October 2014

Authors:

Crystalynne D. Cortez*

Keywords:

Gas Detectors, Gas Monitoring System, Gas Monitors, Gas Sensors, Hazardous Gas Detections

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] J. Chou, in: Hazardous Gas Monitors: A Practical Guide to Selection, Operation and Applications, McGraw Hill Book Co., NY (1999), p.3.

Google Scholar

[2] R. A. Bolmen Jr., in: Semiconductor Safety Handbook, Safety and Health in Semiconductor Industry, Noyes Publications, Westwood, New Jersey (1998), p.587.

Google Scholar

[3] F. G. Banica, in: Chemical Sensors and Biosensors: Fundamentals and Applications, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Publication, West Sussex, United Kingdom (2012), p.4, p.588.

Google Scholar

[4] Information on http: /www. mathesongas. com.

Google Scholar

[5] Information on http: /www. skcinc. com/converter/converter. asp.

Google Scholar

[6] O. Geiss and D. Kotzias, in: Tobacco, Cigarettes and Cigarette Smoke: An Overview, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Italy (2007).

Google Scholar