An Optimization Model for Dynamic Speed Control in Urban Freeway Networks

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper introduced an optimization model to address dynamic speed control strategies for achieving network-wide speed harmonization. Genetic Algorithm (GA) was applied to search the optimal solution of the proposed model. During the search process, a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) based analytical model and microscopic traffic simulation VISSIM were applied to evaluate the performance of possible solutions. The proposed model can be used to determine the deployment of dynamic speed limits, the displayed speed limit, and the timing to change these speed limits. The proposed model was tested using VISSIM in an urban freeway network of about 12 miles long. Different simulation scenarios with varying AADT from 60,000 to 12,000 were tested. It was found that when properly implemented, dynamic speed control can improve traffic flow conditions, reduce congestion and emission, and enhance network throughput. For example, in the selected urban freeway network with the AADT of 80,000, the proposed dynamic speed control strategy can save 5% average travel time, reduce 9% of the vehicles with high collision risk and about 11% emission.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1458-1461

Citation:

Online since:

October 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] FHWA, (2007). Active Traffic Management: The Next Step in Congestion Management., International Technology Scanning Program.

Google Scholar

[2] http: /international. fhwa. dot. gov/pubs/pl07012/index. cfm.

Google Scholar

[3] Metz, N., Schlichter, H. and Schellenberg, H., (1997). Positive effects of a traffic control system on fuel consumption and exhaust emissions on the German A9 Autobahn., Int. J. of Vehicle Design. Vol. 18 (Special Issue), pp.354-367.

Google Scholar

[4] Malenstein, J. and Boersma, T., (1998). Automated Video Speed Enforcement and Trajectory Control, Combined with Fully Automated Processing., Institute for Traffic Care (ITC) Webpage. http: /www. itctraffic. com/videoenforcement. htm.

Google Scholar

[5] NCHRP, (2001). Assessment of Variable Speed Limit Implementation issues. " Project Number 03-59. http: /www. trb. org/TRBNet/ProjectDisplay. asp, ProjectID=812.

Google Scholar

[6] FHWA. 2006. Managing Travel Demand: Applying European Perspectives to U.S. Practice., http: /international. fhwa. dot. gov/traveldemend/index. htm.

Google Scholar

[7] Roadtraffic-Technology. com, M42 Active Traffic Management Scheme, Birmingham, United Kingdom., http: /www. roadtraffic-technology. com/projects/m42.

Google Scholar

[8] Wilkie, J., (1997).

Google Scholar

[9] Kang, K-P, Chang, G., and Zou, N., (2003). Optimal Dynamic Speed-Limit Control for Highway Work Zone Operations, Transportation Research Record: 1877.

DOI: 10.3141/1877-09

Google Scholar

[10] Hegyi, A., Schutter, B. and Hellendoorn, J., (2005). Optimal Coordination of Variable Speed Limits to Suppress Shock Waves, IEEE Transaction on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol, 6, No. 1.

DOI: 10.1109/tits.2004.842408

Google Scholar

[11] Lee, C., Hellinga, B., Saccomanno, F, (2006). Evaluation of Variable Speed Limits to Improve Traffic Safety, Transportation Research Part C, Vol. 14.

DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2006.06.002

Google Scholar