Study on Performances of Refrigeration-Type Compressed-Air Dryers Using Environmentally-Friendly Refrigerants R717, R290 and R600a

Hui Liu; Hong Xiao

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.672-674.1708

Paper Titles

Experimental Study on Throttling Refrigeration System Using Mixed Refrigerants
p.1684

Research Based on the Actual Project of Central Air Conditioning Intelligent Frequency Conversion System
p.1688

Simulation Analysis on Dynamic Load of Air-Conditioning System of Ocean-Going Ship
p.1693

Simulation Study on Ventilation & Cooling for an Indoor Substation
p.1700

Study on Performances of Refrigeration-Type Compressed-Air Dryers Using Environmentally-Friendly Refrigerants R717, R290 and R600a
p.1708

The Application of Genetic Algorithm on the Regulation of Central Heating System
p.1712

The Load’s Control of Central Air Conditioning System Based on Comfort
p.1717

The Research of Constant Temperature and Humidity Air-Conditioning System of Underground Cellar
p.1722

Baseline Load Models of Air-Conditioning in Commercial Buildings Considering Temperature and Seasons
p.1729

HomeApplied Mechanics and MaterialsApplied Mechanics and Materials Vols. 672-674Study on Performances of Refrigeration-Type...

Study on Performances of Refrigeration-Type Compressed-Air Dryers Using Environmentally-Friendly Refrigerants R717, R290 and R600a

Abstract:

The coefficient of performance (COP), the volumetric refrigeration capacity and the pressure ratio of the refrigeration cycle were calculated for a refrigeration-type compressed-air dryer using natural environmentally friendly refrigerants R717, R290 and R610a and compared with those using R22. Study shows that in the working condition of a refrigeration-type compressed-air dryer the COP and volumetric refrigeration capacity using R717 are 5% and 11% higher than those using R22 respectively and COP using R290 is equal to 98% of COP using R22 and the volumetric refrigeration capacity is equal to 85% of that using R22. Although COP using R600a is 2% higher than that using R22, the volumetric refrigeration capacity is much lower than that using other refrigerants above mentioned. R717 and R290 are recommended as appropriate substitute refrigerants for R22 in a refrigeration-type compressed-air dryer.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Renewable Energy and Power Technology II

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 672-674)

Pages:

1708-1711

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.672-674.1708

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

October 2014

Authors:

Hui Liu*, Hong Xiao

Keywords:

Compressed-Air Dryer, Energy Efficiency, Environmentally-Friendly Refrigerant, Refrigeration

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] Huang Hu: Compressed Air Drying and Purification Equipment (in Chinese) (Mechanical Industry Press, Beijing 2004).

Google Scholar

[2] Tian Bo: Low Temperature and Specialty Gases(in Chinese) Vol. 27(2009), p. 5Chen Yunguang.

Google Scholar

[3] LI Jing, CHEN Jianbo, YUE Weiwei and WANG Jun: Energy Research and Information(in Chinese) Vol. 27(2011), p . 164.

Google Scholar

[4] Chen Wu and Mark W. Spatz: BUILDING SCIENCE(in Chinese) Vol. 23(2007), p.66.

Google Scholar

[5] WANG Qian: JOURNAL OF MAOMING COLLEGE(in Chinese) Vol. 15 (2005), p.38.

Google Scholar

[6] He Guogeng and Liu Xuanfei: Refrigeration and Air-Conditioning Vol. 8 (2008), p.58.

Google Scholar

[7] DENG Xinli, and ZHAO Zengqiang: Equipment Manufacturing Technology, VOL. 28(No. 6) (2011), p.198.

Google Scholar

[8] Ding Guoliang, Zhang Chunlu, Zhao Li. New Refrigeration and Air conditioning Refrigerants (in Chinese) ( Shanghai Jiaotong University Press, Shanghai2003).

Google Scholar