Analytic Hierarchy Process on the Gob Natural Gas Pipeline Risk Assessment

Abstract:

The related factors of ground movement and deformation was analyzed in coal mining, geological conditions, Analytic Hierarchy Process to establish a mining methods, mining subsidence formation time, covered lithology, mining depth and thickness ratio, horizontal deformation, curvature radius, inclination, and subsidence value of the gob as the main indicator of the type of evaluation system based on evaluation system divided into different risk levels, and to take appropriate measures to deal with different risk levels. Combined with Second West-East Gas Pipeline Ningshan branch instantiated demonstration showed Hengfa Mined subsidence gas pipeline risk assessment results coincide with the actual impact of the case, to prove that this evaluation method has great practical application guidance.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 675-677)
• Pages: 1371-1375
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.675-677.1371
• Online since: October 2014
• Authors: Jin Dong Wang*, Hai Feng Shen, Zhen Chao Zhao
• Keywords: Analytic Hierarchy Process, Gob Subsidence, Natural Gas Pipeline, Risk Assessment

References

[1] Xue-yi Yu, Enqiang Zhang. Mining damage (second edition) [M]. Beijing: coal industry publishing house, 2010: 93-98. In Chinese.

[2] Xueyi Yu. Studying theory of displacement and deformation in the moutain areass under the influnce of underground exploitation[D], Kracow: AGH University of Science and Technology, 1999. In Chinese.

[3] Peng S S. Surface subsidence Engineering [M]. Inc Littleton Colorado: Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration, (1980).

[4] Xue-yi Yu. China petroleum west-east gas pipeline company. 2009. 10: 96-99. In Chinese.

[5] Yi Luo. West Virginia University. 2011. 06.

[6] Shubo Xu. Tianjin: tianjin science and technology press, 1984, 637. In Chinese.

[7] Bingchao Zhao, Xue-yi Yu. Xi 'an university of science and technology. 2011. 11. In Chinese.