Research on Kinetics of the Vehicle Skidding while Turning

Article Preview

Abstract:

The road traffic accident is a social issue involving thousands of families and everyone is concerned about it. When people are at work, travel, or visit relatives and friends, they hope to keep secure. However, road accidents sometimes might occur. The experienced motorists know that they mustn’t drive fast when they turn in the corners; especially in the rainy slippery situations, road accidents might occur. In this paper, the car skidding dynamics will be studied.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

250-253

Citation:

Online since:

October 2014

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Raymond M. Brach,R. Matthew Brach. A Review of Impact Models for Vehicle Collision. SAE Paper. No. 870048. 1987: 3-7.

DOI: 10.4271/870048

Google Scholar

[2] Bruce Hongola, Cheng-Yao Chan. Simulation and Animation Tools for Analysis of Vehicle Collision: SMAC(Simulation Model Automobile Collisions)and Carmma (Simulation Animations). California PATH Working Paper. ISSN: 1055—1417. 1999: 3-5.

Google Scholar

[3] Cheng—Yao Chan. Studies of Vehicle Coll isions—A Documentation of the Simulation Codes: SMAC(Simulation Model of Automobile Collisions). California PATH Working Paper. ISSN 1055—1417. 1998: 2-7.

Google Scholar

[4] Mchenry B. G., Mchenry R . R. SMAC97 - refinement of the Collision –algorithm. SAE Paper. No. 970947. 1997: l-3.

DOI: 10.4271/970947

Google Scholar

[5] Richard P. Howard, John Boomer, Cleve Bare. Vehicle Restitution Response in Low Velocity Collision[J], SAEl993-01-0842, (1993).

Google Scholar

[6] Mchenry B.G., Mchenry R.R. CRASH 97-refinement of the Trajectory Solution Procedure. SAE Paper. No. 970949. 1997: 2-4.

DOI: 10.4271/970949

Google Scholar

[7] James A. Neptune, James E. Flynn. Impact Analysi s Based upon the CRASH Damage Algorithm. SAE paper. No. 950358. 1995: 1-2.

Google Scholar

[8] Kenneth. Campbell. Energy Basis for Collision Severity. SAE Paper. No. 740565. 1974: l-4.

Google Scholar

[9] Mchenry R.R. Mchenry B.G.A. Revised Damage Analysis Procedure For The CRASH Computer Program. SAE Paper. No. 86 1894. 1986: l-2.

DOI: 10.4271/861894

Google Scholar

[10] Marcus Hiemer, Sebastian Lehr, Uwe Kiencke. A Fuzzy System to Determine the Vehicle Yaw Angle. SAE Paper. No. 2004-01-191. 2004: 1-9.

DOI: 10.4271/2004-01-1191

Google Scholar

[11] Strother C E, Woolley R L, James M B. A comparison between NHTSA crash test data and CRASH3 frontal stiffness coefficients[C]. SAE, 900101, (1990).

DOI: 10.4271/900101

Google Scholar

[12] James A N, Crush stiffness coefficients, restitution constants, and a revision of Crash3&SMC[C]. SAE 980029, (1998).

DOI: 10.4271/980029

Google Scholar

[13] Hermann Steffan B.C. Geile. A New Approach to Occupant Simulation through the Coupling of PC-Crash and MADYMO. SAE Paper. No. 1999-01-0444. 1999: l-5.

DOI: 10.4271/1999-01-0444

Google Scholar

[14] Michael S. Varat, Stein E. Husher. Crash Pulse Modeling for Vehicle Safety Research. The 18"PESV Paper. No. 50 1. 200 1: 1-5.

Google Scholar

[15] A. Moser, Steffan,G. Kasanieiey, The Pedestrian Model in PC-Crash the introduction of a Multi Body System and its Validation SAE 1999-01-1445.

DOI: 10.4271/1999-01-0445

Google Scholar

[16] Hermann Steffan B.C. Geigl, Anoteas Moser,A. New Approach of Occupant Simulation through Coupling of PC-Crash and MADYMO. SAE 1999-01-0444.

DOI: 10.4271/1999-01-0444

Google Scholar