Research on the Congestion Management of Power System Based on Multi-Objective Functions and Primal-Dual Interior Point Method

Article Preview

Abstract:

Congestion management is a hot point for research in power system. Optimal power flow (OPF) model is often used to solve this problem. However, the results cannot satisfy with market needing. To solve this problem, this paper presents a novel method of congestion management based on risk constraint and fuzzy optimization in electricity power markets. The risk constraint is used for transmission line thermal security instead of the traditional deterministic current or power constraint. The multi-objective functions are used to coordinate the conflict between security and efficiency of transmission network. Primal-Dual Interior Point Method (PDIPM) is adopted to solve the RBOPF problem. The method can minimize re-dispatch cost and the system operating risk.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

3191-3194

Citation:

Online since:

November 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Fang R S, David A K. Optimal dispatch under transmission contracts. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1999, 14(2): 732-737.

DOI: 10.1109/59.761905

Google Scholar

[2] Singh H, Hao S, Papalexopoulos A. Transmission congestion management in competitive electricity markets. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1998, 13(2): 672-680.

DOI: 10.1109/59.667399

Google Scholar

[3] Yu Chiwn et al. A direct nonlinear predictor-corrector primal-dual interior-point algorithm for optimal power flows. IEEE Trans on PES 1994, 9(2): 876-883.

DOI: 10.1109/59.317660

Google Scholar

[4] Geraldo L T, Victor H Q. On a nonlinear multiple-centrality-corrections interior-point method for optimal power flows. IEEE Trans on PES, 2001, 16(2): 222-228.

DOI: 10.1109/59.918290

Google Scholar

[5] Wang X, Song Y H. Advanced real-time congestion management through both pool balancing market and bilateral market. IEEE Power Engineering Review, 2000, 20(2): 47-49.

DOI: 10.1109/39.819917

Google Scholar

[6] Luo X, Patton A D, et al. Real power transfer capability calculations using multi-layer feed-forward neural networks. IEEE Trans on PES, 2000, 15(2): 903-908.

DOI: 10.1109/59.867192

Google Scholar

[7] Chen C L, Lee T Y, Jan R M. Optimal wind-thermal coordination dispatch in isolated power systems with large integration of wind capacity. Energy Conversion and Management, 2006, 47(18): 3456- 3472.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2005.12.016

Google Scholar

[8] Attaviriyanupap P, Kita H, Tanaka E, et al. A hybrid EP and SQP for dynamic economic dispatch with nonsmooth fuel cost function. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2002, 17(2): 411-416.

DOI: 10.1109/tpwrs.2002.1007911

Google Scholar

[9] Ang A H S, Pires J, Villaverde R, et al. Seismic probabilistic reliability assessment of electric power transmission systems. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 1996, 51(1): 7 -22.

DOI: 10.1016/0951-8320(95)00101-8

Google Scholar