Determination of X-Ray Elastic Constants for Q1N Submarine Pressure Hull Steel

Article Preview

Abstract:

The Canadian Navy has a requirement to conduct on-site accurate residual stress investigations to improve the efficacy of risk assessment and damage tolerance analysis of critical structures. This paper describes the techniques for qualification of the portable miniature X-ray diffractometer (mXRD) for residual stress analysis on Canadian VICTORIA Class submarine (VCS) pressure hulls. The effect that thermomechanical processing has on the X-ray elastic constant (XREC) and resultant stress analysis is discussed. The approach for calibration of the mXRD equipment and calculation of residual stress values from strain measurements is explained. A new methodology for determination of the XREC, based on the ‘multiple angle method’, is presented discussed and applied to describe the stress-strain relation for tempered Q1N steel. This method, which expands on the ASTM standard, examines the change in lattice strain at multiple y angles (∂dfy /∂sin2y) and provides improved statistical error over the ASTM standard. An XREC of 195 ±6 GPa was experimentally determined for Q1N steel using the {211} crystallographic planes of bcc Fe (using Cr Kα radiation) using the multiple angle method.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

285-290

Citation:

Online since:

August 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] M.E. Brauss, G.V. Gorveatte and J.F. Porter, Proceedings of SPIE's Nondestructive Evaluation of Materials and Composites, Scottsdale, Arizona (1996), pp.307-317.

Google Scholar

[2] P.J. Withers and H.K.D.H. Bhadeshia, Materials Sciences and Technology, Vol. 17 (2001), pp.355-365.

Google Scholar

[3] M. Belassel: Residual stress analyzer: Theory of operation manual, Beta Version (Proto Manufacturing Ltd. Instrument Manual, 2001), p.120.

Google Scholar

[4] J. Lu, in: Handbook of Measurement of Residual Stresses, edited by J. Lu, Society for Experimental Mechanics Inc., Fairmont Press Inc., Lilburn GA (1996), pp.225-231.

Google Scholar

[5] V. Huak, in: Residual Stresses: Measurement, Calculation, Evaluation, edited by V. Hauk, H. Hougardy, and E. Macherauch, DGM Informationsgesellschaft Oberursel (1991), pp.3-20.

Google Scholar

[6] M. François, F. Convert, J. Lu, J.M. Sprauel, J.L. Lebrun, N. Ji, C.F. Déhan, R.W. Hendricks and M.R. James, in: Handbook of Measurement of Residual Stresses, edited by J. Lu, Society for Experimental Mechanics Inc., Fairmont Press Inc., Lilburn GA (1996).

Google Scholar

[7] P.S. Prevéy, in: Metals Handbook. Vol. 10, Metals Park: American Society for Metals (1986) pp.380-392.

Google Scholar

[8] H.A. Kuhn, in: ASM Handbook, Vol. 8, Mechanical Testing and Evaluation, edited by H.A. Kuhn and D. Medlin for ASM International, Materials Park, Ohio (1990), pp.49-69.

Google Scholar

[9] R.H. Marion and J.B. Cohen, The Need for Experimentally Determined X-Ray Elastic Constants", Technical report of the Dept of Materials Sci. & and Eng. Northwestern University of Evanston Ill, (1976), 16 pages.

DOI: 10.21236/ada030616

Google Scholar

[10] SAE J784a, Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) Information Report, Second Edition, Published by SAE Inc., New York (1971), 119 pages.

Google Scholar

[11] A. Bahadur, B.R. Kumar and S.G. Chowdhury, Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, Vol. 22, (2003) pp.53-62.

Google Scholar

[12] DEFSTAN 02-736 UK Ministry of Defence Requirement for Q1(Navy) Quality Steel Part 1 Plates, Issue 2, Part 1, United Kingdom Defence Standardization, Glasgow (2004).

Google Scholar

[13] EM-00, in: Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 03. 01, ASTM, Philadelphia (2000), pp.77-98.

Google Scholar

[14] E132-97, in: Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 03. 01, ASTM, Philadelphia (2000), pp.264-266.

Google Scholar

[15] S.P. Farrell and L.W. MacGregor, unclassified, limited distribution Defence R&D Canada – Atlantic internal report (DRDC Atlantic TM 2007-335) (2008).

Google Scholar

[16] J.A. Pineault, M. Belassel and M.E. Brauss, in: ASM Handbook, Vol. 11, Failure Analysis and Prevention, edited by W.T. Becker and R.J. Shipley for ASM International, Materials Park, Ohio (2007), pp.484-497.

DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v11.a0003528

Google Scholar

[17] E915-96, in: Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 03. 01, ASTM, Philadelphia (2000), pp.809-812.

Google Scholar

[18] E855-90, in: Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 03. 01, ASTM, Philadelphia (2000), pp.680-686.

Google Scholar

[19] E1426-98, in: Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 03. 01, ASTM, Philadelphia (2000), pp.916-919.

Google Scholar