Penalty Method Involving Electric Sliding Contact Problem

Article Preview

Abstract:

Basing on governing Maxwell and energy equation of rail gun considering armature movement in two dimension, The total domain to be solved is divided into two subdomains: moving (armature) part and static (rail) part, finite element formulations of two subdomains are built independently, then using the interface condition of two subdomains, formulations are connected by coupled equation which is derived out by penalty method. Shifted physical quantity is used to simulate movement. The final magnetic-thermal coupled fields finite element formulations of rail gun are established by these methods. Numerical calculation results compared by theoretical and other numerical results verify that penalty method is an effective way to deal with electric sliding contact problem associating with Shifted physical quantity method.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

246-249

Citation:

Online since:

December 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] K. T. Hsieh and B. K. Kim. 3D Modeling of Sliding Electrical Contact[J]. IEEE Transactions On Magnetics, 1997, 33(1): 237-239.

DOI: 10.1109/20.559961

Google Scholar

[2] Thomas G. Engel, Jesse M. Neri, and Michael J. Veracka. Characterization of the Velocity Skin Effect in the Surface Layer of a Railgun Sliding Contact[J]. IEEE Transactions On Magnetics, 2007, 44(17): 1837-1844.

DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2008.922310

Google Scholar

[3] M. Ghassemi and Y. M. Barsi. Effect of liquid film (Indium) onthermal and electromagnetic distribution of an electromagnetic launcher with new design[J]. IEEE Transactions On Magnetics, 2005, 41(1), 408–413.

DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2004.838759

Google Scholar

[4] M. Ghassemi, Y. Molayi, and M. H. Hamedi. Analysis Of Force Distribution Acting Upon The Rails And The Armature And Prediction Of Velocity With Time In An Electromagnetic Launcher With New Method[J]. IEEE Transactions On Magnetics, 2007, 43(1): 132-136.

DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2006.887645

Google Scholar

[5] Yan Dengjun, LIU Ruifang, HU Minqiang, HAN Jingdong. A New Method To Deal With The Motion Problem in Electromagnetic Field Finite Element Analysis[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2003, 23(8): 163-167. (In Chinese).

DOI: 10.1109/icems.2005.202935

Google Scholar

[6] Zhang Yang, Bai Baodong, Xie Dexin. New Method to Solve 3D Transient Electromagnetic Field-Circuit-Motion Coupling Problem[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2008, 28(9): 139-144. (In Chinese).

DOI: 10.1109/cefc-06.2006.1632953

Google Scholar

[7] Huang Tao, Ruan Jiangjun, Zhang Yujiao, et al. Research on the Time Stepping Element Method for Solving the Transient Motion Electromagnetic Problems[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2013, 33(6): 168-175. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[8] Stefani, R. Merrill, and T. Watt. Numerical Modeling of Melt Wave Erosion in Two Dimensional Block Armatures[J]. IEEE Transactions On Magnetics, 2005, 41(1): 437-441.

DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2004.838758

Google Scholar

[9] P. Parks. Current melt wave model for transitioning solid armatures[J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 1990, 67(7): 3511–3516.

DOI: 10.1063/1.345342

Google Scholar

[10] J. Barber and Y. Dreizin. Model of contact transitioning with realistic armature rail interface[J]. IEEE Transactions On Magnetics, 1995, 31(1): 96-100.

DOI: 10.1109/20.364721

Google Scholar