Numerical Experimental Research on Shear Strength of Rock Mass Discontinuity Concerning Roughness

Article Preview

Abstract:

The discontinuity’s surface topography is often assumed as smooth and straight. To overcome non-considering roughness of discontinuity, direct shear numerical experiment is proposed to research influences of discontinuous roughness on its strength. Firstly, based on researched mechanical properties of discontinuity, the laws how asperity inclination angles and asperity heights of discontinuity and the mechanical behavior of discontinuity are studied. The results show that the failure of discontinuity considering roughness is not instantaneous. It is a complex process which goes through energy accumulation. The cohesive force increases with asperity inclination angle and asperity height increasing. The inner friction angle also goes through the same changes. However, when the normal stress reaches 500kPa for asperity inclination angle and 700kPa for asperity height, the shear strength experiences a decreasing process.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

289-293

Citation:

Online since:

December 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Barton N. R., A relationship between joint roughness and joint shear strength[C].In:Rock Fracture: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Rock Mechanics[A], Nancy, France, 1971, pp.1-8.

Google Scholar

[2] Barton N. R. ,Choubey V., The shear strength of rock joints in theory and practice[J]. Rock Mechanics, Vol. 10(1977), pp.1-54.

DOI: 10.1007/bf01261801

Google Scholar

[3] Barton N. Review of a new shear strength criteria for rock joints[J].Engineering Geology, Vol. 7 (1973), pp.287-332.

DOI: 10.1016/0013-7952(73)90013-6

Google Scholar

[4] Tse R., Cruden D. M., Estimating joint roughness coefficients[J].International Journal of Rock Mechanics Mining Science and Geomechanics Abstracts, Vol. 16 (1979), pp.303-307.

DOI: 10.1016/0148-9062(79)90241-9

Google Scholar

[5] Turk N., Dearman W. R., Investigation of some rock joint properties: roughness angle determination and joint closure[C]. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Fundamentals of Rock Joints[A], Bjrkliden, Sweden, 1985, p.197–204.

Google Scholar

[6] Carr J. R., Warriner J. B., Relationship between the fractal dimension and joint roughness coefficient[J]. Bulletin of the Association of Engineering Geologists, Vol. 26(1989), pp.253-264.

DOI: 10.2113/gseegeosci.xxvi.2.253

Google Scholar

[7] Wang T., Sheng Q., Chen X. L. 3D discrete element based on direct method of joint network simulation. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 24 ( 2005), pp.1649-1653 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[8] Du S. Q., Pan B. T. The fractal behavior of joints roughness coefficient of rock mass, Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology, Vol. 20(1993), pp.36-39 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar