Planning as a Part of Distribution Policy in Chosen Company

Article Preview

Abstract:

Planning presents base of all other managerial function of the company and it runs at all levels. In case company wants to be competitive, it must plan all its activities, while one of the most important plans in industrial company presents plan of production. Exactly from it all other activities are developed. Contribution is orientated to the processes that directly depend on planning of production, mainly from acceptance of order, stocks ́ analysis, determination of goals, production process to quality control. Its goal is to suggest increasing of effectiveness in process of production planning with orientation to concrete project in chosen company that would bring also costs saving.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

76-81

Citation:

Online since:

December 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] V. Modrák, Planning of production, Prešov, 2006. (original in Slovak).

Google Scholar

[2] Information on http: /www. businessknowledgesource. com/manufacturing/production_leveling_extended_entry_026155. html.

Google Scholar

[3] Information on http: /www. exforsys. com/career-center/performance-development/performance-development-planning-pdp. htm.

Google Scholar

[4] K. Teplická, K. Čulková, E. Manová, Using of operation analysis models in selected industrial firm, Acta Montanistica Slovaca. 17-3 (2012) 151-157.

Google Scholar

[5] A. Rosová, Indices system design of distribution logistics, transport logistics and materials flow as parts of controlling in enterprise's logistics, Acta Montanistica Slovaca, 15-1 (2010) 67-72. (original in Slovak).

Google Scholar

[6] S. J. Lim, S. J. Jeong, K. S. Kim, M. W. Park, A simulation approach for production-distribution planning with consideration given to replenishment policies, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 27-5, 6 (2006) 593-603.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-004-2208-2

Google Scholar