Design Optimization to Reduce Variation in Manufacturing Process

Article Preview

Abstract:

The variation on the product functional parameter has been shown to cause potential failures. These potential failures may not be caught in production line, but become the reason of customer complaints. To enable the development of robust method to detect variation, this work explores the possible sign from the data of sector reports and transforms the questioned data to the variation by Six Sigma Methodology. The key techniques of DMAIC, MVA, SPC and RSMDOE are utilized. The method is designed with three phases: firstly it is to analyze the data from the sector report to detect the peculiar value. Then the performance is evaluated to identify the variation. In the last step the issue related to the variation is solved by design optimization. The method is evaluated in the manufacturing site with the material consumption data, and the excessive 20% consumption caused by the variation is saved, which demonstrates this variation detection method is in feasible and efficient manner for quality management.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

534-538

Citation:

Online since:

December 2014

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Chong Un Pyon, Ji Young Woob, Sang Chan Park. Intelligent service quality management system based on analysis and forecast of VOC, Expert Systems with Applications. 2010, 37, pp.1056-1064.

DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.06.066

Google Scholar

[2] Karl Luce, Lucie Trepanier, Fred Ciochetto, Lawrence Goldman SIMULATION AND OPTIMIZATION AS EFFECTIVE DFSS TOOLS,. Proceedings of the 2005 Winter Simulation Conference, Dec. 2005, p.1993-(1999).

DOI: 10.1109/wsc.2005.1574478

Google Scholar

[3] Omera Khan, Martin Christopher, Alessandro Creazza. Aligning product design with supply chain: a case study,. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Vol. 17, No. 3, 2012, pp.323-336.

DOI: 10.1108/13598541211227144

Google Scholar

[4] E. V. Gijoa, Johny Scariab, Jiju Antonyc. Application of Six Sigma Methodology to Reduce Defects of a Grinding Process,. International Quality and Reliability Engineering, May, 2011, pp.1221-1234.

DOI: 10.1002/qre.1212

Google Scholar

[5] Karim Moustaghfir. The dynamics of knowledge assets and their link with firm performance,. MEASURING BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2008, pp.10-24.

DOI: 10.1108/13683040810881162

Google Scholar

[6] David M. Ferrin, Martin J. Miller, David Muthler. Lean Sigma And Simulation, so What's the Correlation? V2,. Proceedings of the 2005 Winter Simulation Conference, Dec. 2005, p.2011-(2015).

DOI: 10.1109/wsc.2005.1574481

Google Scholar

[7] Yun-na Liu, Kang Li. Application of Six Sigma Methodology DMAIC in HR Project Management-A Case Study of Motorola SC HR DSS Project,. 2011 IEEE 18th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, Sep. 2011, pp.1340-1343.

DOI: 10.1109/icieem.2011.6035403

Google Scholar

[8] Bob Little. Six Sigma techniques improve the quality of e-learning,. Industrial and Commercial Training, Vol. 35, No. 3, 2003, pp.104-108.

DOI: 10.1108/00197850310470320

Google Scholar

[9] He Zhen, Qi Ershi, Liu Zixian. QUALITY IMPROVEMENT THROUGH SPC/DOE IN SMT MANUFACTURING,. Proceedings of the ICMIT 2000 Conference, Nov. 2000, pp.855-858.

DOI: 10.1109/icmit.2000.916817

Google Scholar

[10] Salah Haridy, Sherif Araby Gouda, Zhang Wu. An Integrated Framework of Statistical Process Control and Design of Experiments for Optimizing Wire Electrochemical Turning Process,. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 53, n1-4, Mar. 2011, pp.191-207.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-010-2828-7

Google Scholar

[11] Tan Phong Nguyen, Nidal Hilal, and Nicholas P. Hankins. Operating Conditions Corresponding to Optimal Final Properties of Activated Sludge Using the DOE and RSM Techniques,. Separation Science and echnology, 2009, 44: p.2041-(2066).

DOI: 10.1080/01496390902881303

Google Scholar

[12] Deniz Bas, Ismail H. Boyac. Modeling and optimization I: Usability of response surface methodology,. Journal of Food Engineering, 2007, 78, pp.836-845.

Google Scholar