Research on R&D Cooperation of Petrochemical Enterprise Based on Game Theory

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this paper, it is researched the cooperated R&D problem in new petrochemical product development for petrochemical enterprise. Based on game theory, a cooperated R&D game theory is established. Given the payoff matrix and the strategy set of this model, and it is analyzed the game process of the two players and the dominant strategy. For the reasons of high development costs, great failure loss, individual limited rationality and lack mutual trust, this dominant strategy cannot be achieved in practice. This paper also provides us a pattern for analyze the cooperated R&D between enterprises and institute.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

2257-2261

Citation:

Online since:

July 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] H. Mitsuhashi and H.R. Greve. A matching theory of alliance formation and organizational success: Complementarity and compatibility. The Academy of Management Journal, 2009, 52(5): 975-995.

DOI: 10.5465/amj.2009.44634482

Google Scholar

[2] R. Culpan. A fresh look at strategic alliances: research issues and future directions. International Journal of Strategic Business Alliances, 2009, 1(1): 4-23.

DOI: 10.1504/ijsba.2009.023649

Google Scholar

[3] R. Cellini and L. Lambertini. Dynamic R&D with spillovers: Competition vs cooperation. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2009, 33(3): 568-582.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jedc.2008.08.006

Google Scholar

[4] D. Li, et al. Friends, acquaintances, or strangers? Partner selection in R&D alliances. The Academy of Management Journal, 2008, 51(2): 315-334.

DOI: 10.5465/amj.2008.31767271

Google Scholar

[5] C.F. Cheng, M.K. Lai, and W.Y. Wu. Exploring the impact of innovation strategy on R&D employees' job satisfaction: A mathematical model and empirical research. Technovation, 2010, 30(7-8): 459-470.

DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2010.03.006

Google Scholar

[6] G. Villani. An R&D investment game under uncertainty in real option analysis. Computational Economics, 2008, 32(1): 199-219.

DOI: 10.1007/s10614-008-9133-7

Google Scholar

[7] E. Bompard, et al. A game theory simulator for assessing the performances of competitive electricity markets. Electric Power Systems Research, 2008, 78(2): 217-227.

DOI: 10.1016/j.epsr.2007.02.007

Google Scholar

[8] Z. Ge and Q. Hu. Collaboration in R&D activities: Firm-specific decisions. European Journal of Operational Research, 2008, 185(2): 864-883.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2007.01.020

Google Scholar

[9] M. Nagarajan and G. Sosic. Game-theoretic analysis of cooperation among supply chain agents: Review and extensions. European Journal of Operational Research, 2008, 187(3): 719-745.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.05.045

Google Scholar

[10] M. Esmaeili, M.B. Aryanezhad, and P. Zeephongsekul. A game theory approach in seller-buyer supply chain. European Journal of Operational Research, 2009, 195(2): 442-448.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.02.026

Google Scholar

[11] A. Sadeghi and M. Zandieh. A game theory-based model for product portfolio management in a competitive market. Expert Systems With Applications, (2010).

DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.11.054

Google Scholar

[12] E. Semsar-Kazerooni and K. Khorasani, Multi-agent team cooperation: A game theory approach. Automatica, 2009, 45(10): 2205-2213.

DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2009.06.006

Google Scholar

[13] G. Kol and M. Naor. Cryptography and game theory: Designing protocols for exchanging information. Theory of Cryptography, 2008: 320-339.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-78524-8_18

Google Scholar