Characterization Parameters in the Heavy Metal Electrokinetic Removal Process of the Fly Ash

Article Preview

Abstract:

Electrokinetic removal is a new kind of technology and it is paid close attention in many countries. This work shows the laboratory results of electrodialytic removal experiments about the fly ash from municipal solid waste in Chongqing. The characterization parameters of the electrolyte solution pH, electric current, electrical conductivity, voltage gradient were discussed after the experiment. The pH value changed smoothly in the cathode compartment, while it changed abruptly in the first 6 hours, but it changed smoothly in the rest time in the anode compartment. The electrical current increased in the first 50 hours, then gradually decreased in the rest time. The higher the electrical current is, the better the removal effect is. The electrical conductivity in the anode compartment increased while the electrical conductivity decreased in the cathode compartment. The higher the electrical conductivity is, the better the removal effect is. The metal hydroxide precipitation was the most serious factor that influenced the removal rate.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

3628-3632

Citation:

Online since:

July 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Song Yuyin, The treating technology of municipal solid waste[J] Environmental Science and Technology, 4(2), 41-45 (1991).

Google Scholar

[2] Xiao Can, Py Min, Zou Luquan and etc. Practice in recycling fly ash[J], Nonferrous Metals Engineering & Research, 30(6), 50-54 (2009).

Google Scholar

[3] ZHANG RuinaAn overview on treatment of municipal solid waste incineration fly ash[J], Journal of Science and Technology of Suzhou, 16(1), 23-29 (2003).

Google Scholar

[4] Zhao Youcai, Song Lijie, Li Guojian.Chemical stabilization of MSW incinerator fly ashes [J], Journal of Hazardous Materials, 950(2):48-63 (2002).

DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3894(02)00002-x

Google Scholar

[5] B.E. Reed, T.B. Mitchell Chemical conditioning of electrode reservoirs during electrokinetic soil flushing of Pb-contaminated silt loam, J. Environ. Eng. 121 (11): 805–815. (1995).

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9372(1995)121:11(805)

Google Scholar

[6] Zhonghui XU, Xi PENG, Zaijiang Zhou, Dongwei LI. Evaluation the Species Distribution of Heavy Metals in Electrokinetic Removal with Visual Minteq. DisasteAdvances, 2010, vol. 3(4): 242~245 (2010).

Google Scholar

[7] Richer U, BirnbaumL. Detailed investigation of filter ash from municipal solid waste incineration[J]. Waste Management Research, 16(2): 190-197 (1998).

Google Scholar

[8] Ryo Yoshiie. Influence of ash composition on heavy metal emissions in ash melting process[J], Fuel, 8(1): 1335-1340 (2002).

DOI: 10.1016/s0016-2361(02)00041-8

Google Scholar

[9] Ryo Yoshiie, Megumi Kawaguchi. Experimental analysis of heavy metal emission in melting treatment of incinerator ash[J], Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan, 33(3): 551-554 (2000).

DOI: 10.1252/jcej.33.551

Google Scholar

[10] Giombattista Traina, Luciano Morselli. Electrokinetic remediation of bottom ash from municipal solid waste incinerator[J], Electrochimica Acta, 52: 3380–3385 (2007).

DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2006.05.067

Google Scholar

[11] Zhonghui XU, Dongwei LI. Electrokinetic Removal of Zinc from Ancient Pyrometallurgical Slag. Research Journal of Chemistry and Environment, 14(4): 44-48 (2010).

Google Scholar

[12] Ahmet Altin, Mustafa Degirmenci. Lead (II) removal from natural soils by enhanced electrokinetic remediation[J], Science of theTotal Environment, 337: 1– 10 (2005).

DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.06.017

Google Scholar

[13] Akira Sawada, Shunitz Tanaka, Masami Fukushima and Kenji Tatsumi. Electrokinetic remediation of clayey soils containing copper(II)-oxinate using humic acid as a surfactant[J], Journal of Hazardous Materials B96: 145–154 (2003).

DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3894(02)00168-1

Google Scholar