Research on Framework of Urban-Rural Spatial Structure and Morphology Based on Cultural Theory

Article Preview

Abstract:

According to strategic aim of great development in national culture and aspiration of constructing cultural city in planning scholar-circles, this theory discusses the issue of urban sustainable development in the condition of restriction in natural resources. This framework integrated the both of qualitative and quantitative research in order to realizing the aim of constructing the cultural paradigm theory in urban-rural spatial planning research. This paper presents the complicated system theory in urban-rural spatial structure and morphology based on cultural connotation, interprets culture in terms of anthropological connotation and fundamental philosophical categories, sets up logical structure of culture, presents hierarchy of needs theory based on cultural structure, builds the relevant models of cultural structure-dynamics and urban-rural spatial structure and morphology. This paper presents theory in urban developmental history based on cultural interpretation, establishes prospective theory in green building and eco-homeland based on cultural concepts.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

4689-4700

Citation:

Online since:

July 2011

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] QIU Baoxin: Debate on urbanization mode with Chinese Characteristic. Journal of city planning review Vol. 11(2008), pp.11-14. in Chinese.

Google Scholar

[2] ZOU DeCi and JinQiu ZHANG.: Cultural Renaissance in Rapid Urbanization. Journal of city planning review Vol. 12 (2007), pp.41-46. in Chinese.

Google Scholar

[3] QIU Baoxin: Urban Culture Rejuvenation and Planning Reform. Journal of city planning review Vol. 8 (2007), pp.9-13. in Chinese.

Google Scholar

[4] SHAN Jixiang: Conservation of Urban Cultural Heritage and Construction of Cultural City. Journal of city planning review Vol. 5 (2007), pp.9-23. in Chinese.

Google Scholar

[5] YI Xiaofeng: From Property-Led to Culture-Led: UK Urban Regeneration Approaches Since the 1980s. Journal of city planning review Vol. 6 (2009), pp.66-71. in Chinese.

Google Scholar

[6] LIU Helin: TheInterpretation andUutilization of Urban Cultural Space: NewApproach in Constructing Cultural City( Dongnan univercity press, Nanjing 2010), in Chinese.

Google Scholar

[7] CHEN Feng: Differentiation of Idealism and Rationalism in Urban Planning. Journal of city planning review Vol. 2 (2007), pp.9-18. in Chinese.

Google Scholar

[8] QIU Baoxin: Complicated Science and Urban Planning Reform. Journal of city planning review Vol. 4 (2009), pp.11-20. in Chinese.

Google Scholar

[9] Tingwei ZHANG.: Planning Theories and Reform in Transitional China. Journal of city planning review Vol. 3 (2008), pp.15-24. in Chinese.

Google Scholar

[10] ZHANG Wenhuei and ZHANG Lin: Modernity Transition: Philosophy Background of West Modern Urban Planning Thoughts. Journal of city planning review Vol. 2 (2008), pp.66-70. in Chinese.

Google Scholar

[11] WU Zhicheng and QIAN Chenjia: A Study on the Paradigm Theory in Urban Planning Research. Journal of urban planning forum, Vol. 5(2009), pp.28-35. in Chinese.

Google Scholar

[12] Radcliffe-Brown ,A. R.: Structure and Function in Primitive Society (Cohen and West, London 1952).

Google Scholar

[13] H. Haken, in: Synergetics: Cooperative Phenomena in Multi- componet Systems, edtied by H. Haken, Teubner, Stutgart1973.

Google Scholar

[14] WANG Mingming: Ten Introduction about Western Anthropology Thoughts. (Guangxi normal university press, Gueilin 2005). in Chinese.

Google Scholar

[15] Yifeng WEN. Art ideas and architectural aesthetics (people's daily press, Beijing 2006). in Chinese.

Google Scholar

[16] Leach, Edmund: Culture and Communication (cambridge university Press, cambridge 1976).

Google Scholar

[17] Paul. N. Balchin, David Issc and Jean Chen: Urban Economics: A Global Perspective(Balgrave Publishers Ltd 2001).

Google Scholar

[18] Coase R. The new Institutional Economics. Journal of American economic review Vol. 2(1998), pp.72-74.

Google Scholar

[19] Anthony Giddens: the Constitution of Society(Polity Press, Cambridge 1984).

Google Scholar

[20] Hagerstrand: Space, time and human conditon. edtied by Karlqvist , in: Dynamic Allocation of Urban Space(Saxon House, Farbborrough 1975).

Google Scholar

[21] Arthur O'Sullivan: Urban Economics(Simplified Chinese translation edition jointly published by McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Co. and Peking University Press. Beijing2008). in Chinese.

Google Scholar

[22] Bloch, Maurice: Internal and external memory: Differet ways of being in society. Journal of Iin Suomen Anthropology Vol. 1 (1992), pp.3-15.

Google Scholar

[23] Geerts and Clifford: The Interpretation of Cultures. (Basic Books, New York 1973).

Google Scholar

[24] Fujita M, Krugman P and Venable A. J: The Spatial Economy: Cites, Region, and International Trade(MIT Press, Massachusetts1999).

Google Scholar