Comparative Investigation of an Automated Oceanic Wave Surface Glider Robot Influence on Resistance Prediction Using CFD Method

Article Preview

Abstract:

The wave glider is composed of two parts: the float is roughly the size and shape of a surfboard that contains all the instrumentation needed for scientific experiments; the sub has wings and hangs 6 meters below on an umbilical tether. This difference allows wave energy to be harvested to produce forward thrust. According to the lake of design information and data for the wave glider, the main aim of the study is using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to present a method to predict calm water resistance for the floating part of the wave glider (the hull). Wigley parabolic hull and high speed round bilge form (NPL) have been investigated in order to estimate the hydrodynamic performances of the hull using CFD software fluent. Wave glider is designed with slender hull shapes in order to decrease the wave making resistance of the ship.In this paper a method is evaluated by comparing the numerical predictions for wigley and NPL forms (2m) using the same mesh generation method under the same conditions to design the hull. Calculations for total calm water resistance are carried out using three different mesh sizes for Froude numbers in the range of 0.10 to 0.40 and compared for accuracy of the solution parameters. The close agreement between the numerical predictions shows the importance of CFD applications in estimating the hydrodynamics performance to design the floating hull and the numerical method is useful in glider design. This means that the method discussed in this paper can be used for the resistance calculation of some hulls like the float of the glider.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

91-97

Citation:

Online since:

January 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Hine et al., U. S. Patent 8, 287, 323 B2, Oct. 16, (2012).

Google Scholar

[2] Tom Daniel & Justin Manley & Neil Trenaman, The Wave Glider: enabling a new approach to persistent ocean observation and research, Ocean Dynamics (2011) 61: 1509–1520.

DOI: 10.1007/s10236-011-0408-5

Google Scholar

[3] Y. H. Özdemir S. Bayraktar, T. Yılmaz, Computational Investigation of a Hull, 2nd International Conference on Maritime Research and Transportation ICMRT, (2007).

Google Scholar

[4] Ansys, Fluent 13 User's Guide, Fluent Inc. (2008).

Google Scholar

[5] W. Wigley, A comparison of experimental and calculated wave profiles and wave resistances for a form having parabolic waterlines, Proc. Roy. Soc. London, Ser. A 144 (851) (1934) 144–159.

DOI: 10.1098/rspa.1934.0039

Google Scholar

[6] Calkins D.E., Schachter R.D., Olivera L.T., An automated computational method for planning hull form definition in concept design, Ocean Engineering (2001) 28 297–327.

DOI: 10.1016/s0029-8018(99)00069-4

Google Scholar

[7] Z. Zhi-rong, L.I. Hui, Z.H. Song-ping, and Z. Feng, Application of CFD In Ship Engineering Design Practice and Ship Hydrodynamics, Journal of Hydrodynamics, Ser. B, vol. 18(3), Supplement 1, (2006), pp.315-322.

DOI: 10.1016/s1001-6058(06)60072-3

Google Scholar

[8] Ishikawajima-Harima Heavy Industries Co., Ltd., Technical report, Cooperative experiments on Wigley parabolic models in Japan. Ship Research Institute, University of Tokyo, Dec., (1983).

Google Scholar

[9] William J. Rosemurgy, Deborah O. Edmund, Kevin J. Maki, and Robert F. Beck, A Method for Resistance Prediction in the Design Environment, 11th International Conference on Fast Sea Transportation, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, September (2011).

Google Scholar

[10] F. R. Menter, Two-Equation Eddy-Viscosity Turbulence Models for Engineering Applications, AIAA Journal, (1994) vol. 32(8), pp.1598-1605.

DOI: 10.2514/3.12149

Google Scholar

[11] Peric, Ferziger, J.H., Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics, Springer, 3rd edition (2002).

Google Scholar

[12] W. Marwood, D. Bailey, Design Data for High-speed Displacement Hulls of Round-bilge Form, Ship Report 99, National Physical Laboratory, (1969).

Google Scholar

[13] D. Bailey, The NPL High Speed Round Bilge Displacement Hull Series, Marine Technology Monograph, The Royal Institute of Naval Architects (RINA), vol. 4, (1976).

Google Scholar

[14] C.W. Lin, S. Percival, and E. H. Gotimer, Viscous Drag Calculations for Ship Hull Calculations, " Research Report, (1995).

DOI: 10.21236/ada323498

Google Scholar

[15] Z. Zhi-rong, L.I. Hui, others, Application of CFD In Ship Engineering Design Practice and Ship Hydrodynamics, Journal of Hydrodynamics, Ser. B, vol. 18(3), (2006), pp.315-322.

DOI: 10.1016/s1001-6058(06)60072-3

Google Scholar

[16] Hiroyuki A., others, Experimental separation of ship resistance for thin ship, National Maritime research Institute, (1997).

Google Scholar

[17] Alaaeldeen A., Duan W. and Deng Rui, A Computational Fluid Dynamics Method for Resistance Prediction of the Floating Hull of Wave Glider, Advanced Materials Research Vol. 936 (2014) pp.2114-2119.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.936.2114

Google Scholar

[18] Alaaeldeen A., Duan W. and Deng Rui, Numerical Analysis for Resistance Calculations of NPL as a Floating Hull for Wave Glider, Applied Mechanics and Materials Vol. 619 (2014) pp.38-43.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.619.38

Google Scholar