The Effect of Different Optimization Methods on Robustness for Robust Optimization Design

Article Preview

Abstract:

In view of robustness of objective function and constraints in robust design, the method of maximum variation analysis is adopted to improve the robust design. In this method, firstly, we analyses the effect of uncertain factors in design variables and design parameters on the objective function and constraints, then calculate maximum variations of objective function and constraints. A two-level optimum mathematical model is constructed by adding the maximum variations to the original constraints. Different solving methods are used to solve the model to study the influence to robustness. As a demonstration, we apply our robust optimization method to an engineering example, the design of a machine tool spindle. The results show that, compared with other methods, this method of HPSO(hybrid particle swarm optimization) algorithm is superior on solving efficiency and solving results, and the constraint robustness and the objective robustness completely satisfy the requirement, revealing that excellent solving method can improve robustness.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

464-467

Citation:

Online since:

December 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Caro S. Bennis F, Wenger P. Tolerance Synthesis of Mechanisms: A Robust Design Approach, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 127 (2005) No. 1, pp.86-94.

DOI: 10.1115/1.1825047

Google Scholar

[2] Phadke M. S: Quality Engineering Using Robust Design. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, (1989).

Google Scholar

[3] M. Solanki: Pros and cons of Taguchi's methodology, Journal of the Institution of Engineers, Vol. 80 (1999) No. 2, pp.55-57.

Google Scholar

[4] Jin. R, Chen W: Simpson T W. Comparative studies of metamodelling techniques under multiple modeling criteria, Structural Multidisciplinary Optimization, Vol. 23 (2001) No. 1, pp.1-13.

DOI: 10.1007/s00158-001-0160-4

Google Scholar

[5] A.D. Belegundu, S.H. Zhang: Ronustness of design through minimum sensitivity, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 114 (1992), pp.213-217.

DOI: 10.1115/1.2916933

Google Scholar

[6] A. Parkinson, C. Sorensen, N. Pourhassan: A general approach for robust optimal design, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 127 (2005) No. 3, pp.388-396.

Google Scholar

[7] Guo Chenguang, Wang Pengjia, Tian Peng, et al, Optimization design of CNC Machine Tool Spindle based on Genetic Algorithm, Journal of Northeastern university(Natural Science), Vol. 32 (2011), No. 6, pp.850-853.

Google Scholar