Non-Linear Numerical Simulation on Hysteretic Behavior of SRC Columns

Article Preview

Abstract:

In order to study the mechanics properties to of concrete columns with embedded steel, two groups contrasting analysis models referring to SRC column and RC column are established by using finite element software ABAQUS. Both Static and cycle force are conducted. Analytical results show that bearing capacity and deformation ability of steel embedded reinforced concrete columns (SRC) under static loading are obviously higher than those of the reinforced concrete column (RC). Under the cycle force, the hysteresis circles of the SRC columns are fuller than RC column. The capability of energy consumption of the SRC columns is almost 1.4 times more than the RC columns. Further axial pressure coefficient and stirrup ratio are considered as parameters to study hysteresis characteristics, energy dissipation and the influence of the skeleton curve of SRC columns. The analytical results demonstrate that the hysteresis characteristics and energy dissipationare different with the changes of axial pressure coefficient. Meanwhile, the stirrup ratio of SRC column has little effect on energy dissipation. The study results have some value on the design and application of the SRC columns.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

382-386

Citation:

Online since:

January 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Lieping Ye, Ehua Fang: Summary of Carrying Capability Study of Steel Ribs of Concrete Member in Chinese. Civil Engineering Journal. Vol. 47 No. 5 (2000), pp.1-12.

Google Scholar

[2] Yongjun Lin, Wenhao Cheng : Testing Study of Limit of Axial Compression Ratio of Combined Steel and Concrete Column with Round Bar [J] in Chinese. Civil Engineering Journal. Vol. 34 No. 6 (2001), pp.23-28.

Google Scholar

[3] Kim S.E. and Chen W.F., Practical advanced analysis for braced steel frame design[J].Structural Engineering, 1996, 122(11): 1259-1265.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1996)122:11(1259)

Google Scholar

[4] M. Geromel and O. Mazzarella. Experimental and analytical assessment of the behavior of stainless steel reinforced concrete beams [J]. Materials and Structures, 2005, 38(2): 211-218.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02479346

Google Scholar

[5] Wenzhong Zheng Dynamic performance of angle-steel concrete columns under low cyclic loading-I: Experimental [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2008, 7(1): 67-75.

DOI: 10.1007/s11803-008-0768-0

Google Scholar