3D Model Retrieval Based on Distance Classification Histogram

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper presents a new algorithm to retrieve 3D model on distance classification histogram. First, we select the certain number of random points on the model surface and compute the distance between two random points. Secondly, we sort the distance into two types which is based on the different geometry properties of these distance and construct the distance classification histogram. Finally, we measure the similarity of 3D models by comparing distance classification histogram. The experimental results on PSB show that our method has a good performance in precision and computational complication.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

931-934

Citation:

Online since:

February 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Elad, A. Tal, and S. Ar. Content Based Retrieval of VRML Objects: An Iterative and Interaetive Approach, Proc. 6th Eurographics Workshop on Multimedia 2001, p . 107-118, Manchester, UK, (2001).

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7091-6103-6_12

Google Scholar

[2] B. K. P. Horn, Extended Gaussian images, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 72, no. 12. p.1671~1686, (1984).

Google Scholar

[3] Robert Osada, Thomas Funkhouser, Bernard Chazelle, and David Dobkin. Matching 3d models with shape distributions . In 154-166, the Computer Graphics Society and EUROGRAPHICS, IEEE Computer Society Press, Genova, Italy, May 7-11 (2001).

DOI: 10.1109/sma.2001.923386

Google Scholar

[4] M. Stricker and M. Orengo. Similarity of color images. In SPIE Conference on Storage and Retrieval, Vol. 2420, p.381–392. (1995).

Google Scholar

[5] W. Niblack, R. Barber, W. Equitz, M. D. Flickner, E. H. Glasman, D. Petkovic, P. Yanker, C. Faloutsos, G. Taubin, and Y. Heights. Querying images by content, using color, texture, and shape. In SPIE Conference on Storage and Retrieval for Image and Video Databases, volume 1908, pp.173-187, April (1993).

DOI: 10.1117/12.143648

Google Scholar

[6] Shilane P, MIN P, Kazhdan M, et al. The Princeton shape benchmark [C] /Proceedings of the Shape Modeling International, Genova, 2004, pp.167-178.

DOI: 10.1109/smi.2004.1314504

Google Scholar

[7] C. Y. Ip, D. Lapadat, L. Sieger, et al. Regli. Using shape distributions to compare solid models". Solid Modeling , 02, 2002, p.273–280.

DOI: 10.1145/566282.566322

Google Scholar