Evaluate the Efficiency of Chinese Regional Quality Development Based on DEA and Malmquist Index

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper puts forward a kind of method to evaluating the efficiency of quality development based on DEA .By Making a static efficiency evaluation for the quality development of 31 provinces in China with DEA model and Malmquist Index based on the quality competitiveness evaluation index system, the efficiency of the development of Chinese quality based on the dynamic time sequence have been got. The results showed that the input resource allocation of most provinces is unreasonable on the static time sequence. A low quality development efficiency has been leaded to as a result. The technical efficiency is the most influential in the all, it increased unstably but potentially from 2008 to 2012 based on the dynamic time consider. Therefore, we should pay more attention to technical innovation, in order to developing the development efficiency of quality.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

945-950

Citation:

Online since:

February 2015

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Ashok Kumar, Kathryn E. Sticker, Jayden Mitanni.: Analytical Development and Empirical Validation. University of Michigan Business School. 2009, Vols. pp.7-8.

Google Scholar

[2] Kolbrun Sveinsdottir, Grethe Hyldig, Emilia Martinsdottira. Food Quality and Preference, 2010, (14) pp.237-245.

Google Scholar

[3] Binrong Xie, Yongmei Wu: Standard Science, 2009, (11) pp.78-82.

Google Scholar

[4] Jack E Triplett: Studies in Income and Wealth, 1983, Volume, 47, pp.83-483.

Google Scholar

[5] Shenglong Jin. Macroscopic quality evaluation method- Research of quality index. The second China quality academic BBS conference proceedings, (2005).

Google Scholar

[6] Hong Chen: Journal of Wuhan university (philosophy and social sciences edition), 2010, (63) pp.129-134.

Google Scholar

[7] Jiadong Jiang. Quality competitiveness research and application. Beijing: Chi- na metrology press, (2009).

Google Scholar

[8] Jiadong Jiang: Aeronautic Standardization & Quality, 2004. 1.

Google Scholar

[9] Xiaoping Ma. Quantity Statistics and Management, (2009).

Google Scholar

[10] Danxia Chen, Yong Zhou, etc: Modern Economic Information, pp.350-351.

Google Scholar

[11] Gengbao Huang, Genbao Zhang, Hai feng Zeng, Guoqiang Wang, Likun Liu. Recognition of hidden parameters in quality level measurement. Proceedings of the 27th Chinese Control Conference, CCC. 2008: 127-130. Control Conference, CCC. 2008, pp.127-130.

DOI: 10.1109/chicc.2008.4605764

Google Scholar

[12] Ying Yang, Wanjin Tang, Xiaohong GAO: Quality Management 2009, (3) pp.31-34.

Google Scholar

[13] Jamaluddin Mohd Yunos, David Hawdon: Energy Economics, 1997(19) p.255—269.

Google Scholar

[14] Quanlin Wei. Date Envelopment Analysis. Beijing: Science Press, (2004).

Google Scholar

[15] Jesus T, Pastor C A: Economics Letters, 2005(88) pp.266-271.

Google Scholar

[16] Xiangming Wu, Xiaoli Xu: Economic Research, 2013, 12(9) pp.3-6.

Google Scholar

[17] Wuyi Zhang, Tianming Chen, etc: East China Economic Management, 2013, 27(2) pp.172-176.

Google Scholar

[18] W. W. Copper, Shanling Li, L.M. Seiford: Journal of Productivity Analysis, 2001, 15(3) pp.217-246.

Google Scholar

[19] Kexi Zhu, Jiadong Jiang: Quality and seaworthy, 2012, (6) pp.23-28.

Google Scholar

[20] Jingmin Cha, Xiaoying Wang: China Safety Science Journal, 2013, 23 (4) pp.14-19.

Google Scholar