Sulphate Reduction Control to Enhance Methane Composition in Anaerobic Digester

Article Preview

Abstract:

The aim of this research is to investigate addition of iron (ferric chloride) to control of sulphate reduction in order to enhance the methane production under laboratory scale. The bioreactor Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) undergoes continuous operation under anaerobic condition treating synthetic sulphate enriched wastewater. The wastewater used as influent wastewater with a total COD 8000 mg.L-1. The experiment was conducted for about 64 days and was operated at constant OLR of 2.0(±0.1) kgCOD.m-3.d-1 by maintaining a hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 4 days. The UASB then were feed with sulphate and give the COD/SO4 ratio 5.3, 2.5 and 1.5. Then amount of ferric chloride at 10.4, 22.2 and 44.5 mM was introduce just after methane producing bacteria (MPB) were completely inhibited by sulphate reducing bacteria (SRB) due to decreasing of methane composition (CH4) and high level production of hydrogen sulphide (H2S). The obtained results showed that the FeCl3 negatively impacted the anaerobic digestion process since with each of COD/SO42- ratio, and the amount addition of ferric chloride to feed regime, gives promotion on methane production, with 67, 70 and 69% after approximately 10 to 15 days operating at critical conditions.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

205-209

Citation:

Online since:

February 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Samir K K, Huang J C, 2003. ORP-based oxygenation for sulfide control in anaerobic treatment of high-sulfate wastewater. Wat Res, 37(10): 2053–(2062).

DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1354(02)00618-8

Google Scholar

[2] Mizuno O, Li Y Y, Noike T, 1998. The behavior of sulphate reducing bacteria in acidogenic phase of anaerobic digestion[J]. Wat Res, 2(5): 1626–1634.

DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1354(97)00372-2

Google Scholar

[3] Gilles Percheron, Nicolas Bernet, Rene Moletta, 1997. Start-up of anaerobic digestion of sulfate wastewater[J]. Bioresource Technology, 61: 21–27.

DOI: 10.1016/s0960-8524(97)00060-6

Google Scholar

[4] Koster, I.W., et al., Sulfide inhibition of the methanogenic activity of granular sludge at various pH-levels. Water Research, 1986. 20(12): pp.1561-1567.

DOI: 10.1016/0043-1354(86)90121-1

Google Scholar

[5] Parkin, G. F.; Lynch, N. A.; Kuo, W. C.; Keuren, E. L. van; Bhattacharya, S. K. Interaction between sulfate reducers and methanogens fed acetate and propionate. Water Pollution Control Federation 1990, 62: 780-788.

Google Scholar

[6] Stronach, S.M., T. Rudd, and J.N. Lestern 1986. Anaerobic Digestion Process in Industrial Wastewater Treatment. Springer-Verlag: Berlin Heidelberg, Germany.

Google Scholar

[7] Choi E, Rim JM. Competetition and inhibition of sulfate reducers and methane producers in anaerobic treatment. Wat Sci Technol 1991; 23: 1259-64.

DOI: 10.2166/wst.1991.0577

Google Scholar

[8] McCartney DM, Oleszkiewicz JA. Competition between methanogens and sulfate reducers: effect of COD: sulfate ratio and acclimation. Wat Environ Res 1993; 65(5): 655-64.

DOI: 10.2175/wer.65.5.8

Google Scholar

[9] American Public Health Association (APHA). In: Greenberg, A.E., Eaton, A.D., L.S. Clisceri., Rice, E. W, 2005. (Eds. ). Standard methods for examination of water and wastewater, 21th Ed., Washington, DC., USA.

Google Scholar

[10] McCartney D M, Oleszkiewicz J A, 1991. Sulfide inhibition of anaerobic degradation of lactate and acetate. Water Research, 25: 203-209.

DOI: 10.1016/0043-1354(91)90030-t

Google Scholar

[11] Hilton BL, Archer DB. Anaerobic Digestion of sulfate-rich molasses wastewater. Inhibition of hydrogen sulfides production. BiotechnolBioeng 1988; 31: 885-8.

DOI: 10.1002/bit.260310817

Google Scholar

[12] Oonge Z, Parkin GF. Poisoning of sulfate reduction with molybdenum in anaerobic reactors fed glucose. In: Proceedings of the 45th Industrial Waste Conference, Purdue University, USA; 1992; pp.441-450.

Google Scholar

[13] Barber, W.P. and Stuckey, D. (2000) Nitrogen removal in a modified anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR): 1, Denitrification. Water Research, 34(9), 2413-2422.

DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1354(99)00425-x

Google Scholar

[14] Yuzir, A. and Sallis, P. (2008) The effect of (RS)-MCPP Degradation under anoxic conditions (Sulphate Reducing Bacteria): 1, Advances in Water and Wastewater Treatment Technologies, 16-36.

Google Scholar