Chromosome and Karyotype Analysis of Hibiscus syriacus

Article Preview

Abstract:

The number of ehromosome and karyotype of Hibiscus syriacus L. was analyzed with the root tips squash method. The results showed that the H. syriacus is tetraploid, the ehromosome number of the somatic cell of H. syriacus is 2n=56, and the index of relative length (IRL)= 16L+12M2+8M1+20S. The karyotype formula is K(2n)=4x=56=32m+16sm+8st, and the asymmetric index of karyotype is 62.90%. The karyotype belongs to 2B.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

340-344

Citation:

Online since:

March 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Editorial Board of Chinese Academy of Sciences China Flora. Flora of China[M]. Beijing:Science and Technology Press, 49(2): 61-83, (1984).

Google Scholar

[2] Juan-juan Song. Studies on the Chromosome Number, Ploidy Relationship and Relative Relationship of Several Plants in Hibisucus [D]. Shantou University, (2001).

Google Scholar

[3] Longley A E. Chromosome in Gossypium and Related Genera [J]. J Agric Res, 1933, 46: 217-227.

Google Scholar

[4] Liu Kun, Wang Xing-fen, Chi Ji-na, Zhang Gui-yin, Wu Li-qiang, Li Zhi-kun, Ma Zhi-ying. Mitotic Karyotyping and Meiotic Observation in Hibiscus Moscheutos L. [J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2009, 10(2): 286-289.

Google Scholar

[5] Li Hai-sheng, Li Jing. The Inhibitory Effect of Hibiscus Fruit Flowers to Mice Transplant Tumor. Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs, 1995, 26(2): 87.

Google Scholar

[6] Shang Hong-yan. Studies on Mechanism of Salt Ions Transportation and Distribution in Hibiscus Hamabo Sieb. et Zucc. [D]. Shandong Normal University, (2010).

Google Scholar

[7] Zhu Qi-zhong. The Influences of Different Conditions of Culture upon the Protoplast Culture of Hibisus Syriacus [J]. Journal of Urumqi Adult Education Institute, 1997, (3): 58~61.

Google Scholar

[8] Liu peng-hang, Wang Xing-jun, Liu Zong-hua, Harris P J, Yao Dun-yi. In Vitro Selection of Salt-tolerant Variants of Hibiscus Syriacus L, [J]. Journal of Shandong Normal University (Natural Scienee), 1995, 10(2): 197-199.

Google Scholar

[9] Sun Bing-lun, Huang Mei-zhu, Wu Xiao-ying, Sun Hui-chao, Jiang Chang-yang. Studies on Tissue Culture and the Establishment of the Clone of Hibiscus Syriacus [J]. Journal of Liaoning Forestry Science & Technology, 2010, 2: 30-32-62.

Google Scholar

[10] Li Mao-xue, Chen Rui-yang. A Suggestion on the Standardization of Karyotype Analysis in Plants [J]. Journal of Wuhan Botanical Research, 1985, 3(4): 297-302.

Google Scholar

[11] Levan A, Fredga K, Sandberg A. Nomenclacture Forcentromeric Position on Chromosomes [J]. Hereditas, 1964, 52: 201-220.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1964.tb01953.x

Google Scholar

[12] STEBBINS G L. Chromosomal Evolution in Higher Plants [M]. London: Edward Arnold, 1971: 88.

Google Scholar

[13] Lewis W H. The Status of Polyploidy in Plants and Animals [M]. Guizhou:Guizhou People Press, 1984, 185-186.

Google Scholar

[14] Li-ran Shi, Hui-fen Li, Ru-yong Gao, He-qin Han. Chromosome Number and Karyotype Analysis of Althaea rosea [J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2009(5). 173-174.

Google Scholar

[15] Yang De-wei, Zhu Wen-yin, Lin Jing, Zhao Ling, Zhang Ya-dong, Zzhu Zhen, Chen Tao, Wang Cai-lin. Mapping of QTLs for Phenol Reaction Using Chromosome Segment Substitution Lines in Rice (Oryza sativa L. ) [J]. Jiangsu J. of Agr. Sci., 2008, 24(6): 751-755.

Google Scholar

[16] Wen-yin Zhu, Cai-lin Wang. A Review on Chromosomal Segment Substitution Lines in Crops [J]. Jiangsu J. of Agr. Sci., 2008, 24(6): 963-968.

Google Scholar

[17] Yan Suli, An Yulin, Sun Ruifen, Li Suping. Research Progress of Karyotype Analysis and Chromosome Micro-dissection Technology [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2008(4): 70-74.

Google Scholar

[18] Jin-yao Hu, Zhi-xian Su, Bao-liang Yue, Qiao-ying Zhang. Progress of Karyotype Analysis Method in Plants Research [J]. Journal of Sichuan Teachers College (Natural Science), 2002, 23(3): 239-244.

Google Scholar