The Method of Surveying Concealment Engineering Control Points ITRF Coordinates Based on Gyro Orientation

Article Preview

Abstract:

In the modern geodesy and precise engineering surveying, we often choose ITRF reference frame as the measurement benchmark for research. In some special projects, however, it is difficult to directly get the coordinates of points by GPS, and the visibility conditions between points have also been limited. According to this problem, we propose a new method combining GPS survey and gyrostatic orientation technology, to access the ITRF coordinates of control points indirectly, and analysis and research the related important issues.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1709-1713

Citation:

Online since:

March 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] YANG Jianhua, YANG Zhiqiang, WANG Tengjun, JIANG Gang. An Indirect Survey Method of ITRF Coordinates. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping[J]. 2005, 10.

Google Scholar

[2] SHI Zhen. Research on Key Technology and Application of GAT High-accuracy Magnetic Suspension Gyro Station[D]. Chang'an University, Xi'an, 2011: 30-35.

Google Scholar

[3] ZHANG Guoliang. Mine Surveying[M]. China University of Mining and Technology Press. (2001).

Google Scholar

[4] HUANG Liren. Reference Frame for Crustal Movement Research[J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics, 2002, 22(3): 102-108.

Google Scholar

[5] FU Yang, HAN Ying. ITRF2000 and New Global Plate Motion Model[J]. Journal of Institute of Surveying and Mapping, 2002, 19(2): 85-87.

Google Scholar

[6] YAO Yibin. Study of United Method of Coordinate Datum for Precision GPS Survey[J]. Surveying and Mapping of Geology and Mineral Resources, 2001, (2): 3-5.

Google Scholar

[7] JIAO Wenhai, HE Tao, ZHU Feizhou. The Development of ITRF and Its Role in the Definition and Maintenance of National Coordinate System[J]. Engineering of Surveying and Mapping, 2000, (2): 32-36.

Google Scholar