Paper Titles

Condition Survey Protocol: A System for Building Condition Assessment
p.347

Flat Roof Defect: Preliminary Condition Survey for Water Ponding Monitoring
p.351

Building Defects or Building Failures: Misconception and Understanding
p.355

Common Defects on Floating Mosque: Tengku Tengah Zaharah Mosque, Kuala Ibai, Kuala Terengganu
p.359

The Conceptual Framework of Building Performance-Risk Indicators (PRI) for Buildings Users in Higher Education Institutions
p.363

Well-Being of Malaysia's Disaster-Affected Coastal Communities
p.367

Sustainable Urban Drainage System to Land Use/ Land Cover Change in Samarinda, Indonesia
p.371

Dynamic Analysis on PCI Girder Bridge
p.375

Development of Microcontroller Based Potentiometric Transduction Circuit for a Continuous Fluid Level Sensor
p.379

HomeApplied Mechanics and MaterialsApplied Mechanics and Materials Vol. 747The Conceptual Framework of Building...

The Conceptual Framework of Building Performance-Risk Indicators (PRI) for Buildings Users in Higher Education Institutions

Article Preview

Abstract:

Higher education institutions (HEI) buildings are considered as key functional, as it generates environment, human and economic resources. Initially, growing students’ population with various learning activities has constituted risk emergence, green issues, inefficient of energy use and climate discomfort. To sustain the building efficiency, building performance evaluation plays a vital role to improve performance issues in HEI buildings. This paper presents the construct items of performance criteria, namely Building Performance-Risk Indicators (PRI) as the initial framework for the development of building performance rating tool. The framework considers three criteria as the main focus, i.e. performance element, risk frames and the indicators.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Advances in Green Science, Engineering and Built Environment

Info:

Periodical:

Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volume 747)

Pages:

363-366

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.747.363

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

March 2015

Authors:

Natasha Khalil*, Syahrul Nizam Kamaruzzaman, Abdul Hadi Nawawi, Husrul Nizam Husin, Ahmad Ezane Hashim

Keywords:

Building Performance, Building User, Health Risk, Performance Indicator, Safety Risk

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] A. Gillen, A. Wright, and L. Spink, Student perceptions of a positive climate for learning: a case study, Educ. Psychol. Pract., vol. 27, no. 1, p.65–82, Mar. (2011).

DOI: 10.1080/02667363.2011.549355

[2] H. Altan, Energy efficiency interventions in UK higher education institutions, Energy Policy, vol. 38, no. 12, p.7722–7731, Dec. (2010).

DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.08.024

[3] M. Sapri and S. Muhammad, Monitoring energy performance in higher education buildings for sustainable caumpus, Malaysian J. Real Estate, vol. 5, no. 1, p.1–25, (2010).

[4] M. A. Hassanain, Post-Occupancy Indoor Environmental Quality Evaluation of Student Housing Facilities, Archit. Eng. Des. Manag., vol. 3, no. 4, p.249–256, (2007).

DOI: 10.1080/17452007.2007.9684646

[5] A. L. Olanrewaju, M. F. Khamidi, and A. Idrus, Quantitative analysis of defects in Malaysian university buildings : Providers ', J. Retail Leis. Prop., vol. 9, no. 2, p.137–149, (2010).

DOI: 10.1057/rlp.2010.2

[6] D. Amaratunga and D. Baldry, Building Performance Evaluation In Higher Education Properties: Towards A Process Model, in COBRA 1999, (1999).

[7] N. Almeida, V. Sousa, L. Alves Dias, and F. Branco, A framework for combining risk-management and performance-based building approaches, Build. Res. Inf., vol. 38, no. 2, p.157–174, Apr. (2010).

DOI: 10.1080/09613210903516719

[8] R. J. Cole, Building environmental assessment methods : assessing construction practices, Constr. Manag. Econ., vol. 18, no. 8, p.949–957, (2000).

[9] T. Lützkendorf and D. Lorenz, Integrating sustainability into property risk assessments for market transformation, Build. Res. Inf., vol. 35, no. 6, p.644–661, Nov. (2007).

DOI: 10.1080/09613210701446374

[10] T. Lützkendorf and D. P. Lorenz, Using an integrated performance approach in building assessment tools, Build. Res. Inf., vol. 34, no. 4, p.334–356, Jul. (2006).

DOI: 10.1080/09613210600672914

[11] B. J. Meacham, Risk-informed performance-based approach to building regulation, J. Risk Res., vol. 13, no. 7, p.877–893, Oct. (2010).

DOI: 10.1080/13669871003703260

[12] A. Wolski, N. A. Dembsey, and B. J. Meacham, Accommodating perceptions of risk in performance-based building 're-safety' code development, Fire Saf. J., vol. 34, p.297–309, (2000).

DOI: 10.1016/s0379-7112(00)00003-5

[13] A. Zalejska-Jonsson, Evaluation of low-energy and conventional residential buildings from occupants' perspective, Build. Environ., vol. 58, p.135–144, Dec. (2012).

DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.07.002

[14] B. P. Thompson and L. C. Bank, Risk Perception in Performance-Based Building Design and Applications to Terrorism-Resistant Design, no. February, p.61–69, (2007).

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0887-3828(2007)21:1(61)

[15] W. F. E. Preiser, H. Z. Rabinowits, and E. T. White, Post Occupancy Evaluation. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company CRS Sirrine Houston, TX, (1988).

[16] G. Mcdougall, J. R. Kelly, J. Hinks, and U. S. Bititci, A review of the leading performance measurement tools for assessing buildings, J. Facil. Manag., vol. 1, no. 2, p.142–153, (2002).

DOI: 10.1108/14725960310807881

[17] W. F. E. Preiser and J. L. Nasar, Assessing Building Performance : Its Evolution From Post-Occupancy Evaluation, Archnet-IJAR, Int. J. Archit. Res., vol. 2, no. 1, p.84–99, (2008).

[18] D. Amaratunga and D. Baldry, Appraising the total performance of higher education buildings: A participator y approach towards a knowledge- base system, in Construction and Building Research Conference 1998 : Proceedings (COBRA) 2nd-3rd September 1998, Oxford Brookes University, 1998, p.1.

[19] D. Amaratunga and D. Baldry, A conceptual framework to measure facilities management performance, Prop. Manag., vol. 21, no. 2, p.171–189, (2003).

DOI: 10.1108/02637470310478909

[20] W. F. E. Preiser, Post-Occupancy Evaluation : How to make buildings work better, Facilities, vol. 13, no. 11, p.19–28, (1995).

DOI: 10.1108/02632779510097787

[21] J. E. Woods, Expanding the Principles of Performance to Sustainable Buildings, Real Estate Issues, vol. 33, no. 3, p.37–46, (2008).

[22] B. Meacham, R. Bowen, J. Traw, and A. Moore, Performance-based building regulation: current situation and future needs, Build. Res. Inf., vol. 33, no. 2, p.91–106, Mar. (2005).

DOI: 10.1080/0961321042000322780

[23] R. Spence, Risk and regulation: can improved government action reduce the impacts of natural disasters?, Build. Res. Inf., vol. 32, no. 5, p.391–402, Sep. (2004).

DOI: 10.1080/0961321042000221043

[24] E. Meins, H. Wallbaum, R. Hardziewski, and A. Feige, Sustainability and property valuation: a risk-based approach, Build. Res. Inf., vol. 38, no. 3, p.280–300, Jun. (2010).

DOI: 10.1080/09613211003693879

[25] B. Edwards, University Architecture. Spoon Press (Taylor & Francis Group), UK, (2000).

[26] T. Malmqvist and M. Glaumann, Environmental efficiency in residential buildings – A simplified communication approach, Build. Environ., vol. 44, no. 5, p.937–947, May (2009).

DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2008.06.025

[27] H. H. Ali and S. F. Al, Developing a green building assessment tool for developing countries – Case of Jordan, Build. Environ., p.1–12, (2008).

[28] M. Camilleri, R. Jaques, and N. Isaacs, Impacts of climate change on building performance in New Zealand, Build. Res. Inf., vol. 29, no. 6, p.440–450, Nov. (2001).

DOI: 10.1080/09613210110083636

[29] R. N. Whitfield, Managing Institutional Risks – A Framework, University of Pennsylvania, (2003).