Strength Development of Fine Grained Mortar Containing Fly Ash and Rice Husk Ash

Article Preview

Abstract:

Fine grained mortar (FGM) offers a new innovative technology binder system. The innovative technique is achieved by using a small maximum grain size of 600μm for the mortars. Most of the previous studies have focused on the FA to be replaced in the FGM. There is still lacking of research of using other pozzolanas in making FGM. This paper presents a study of the strength of FGM with partially replacement of ordinary Portland cement (OPC) with fine fly ash (FA) and ground rice husk ash (RHA). Flexural and compressive strength of FGM were tested. The results show that the use of FA and RHA produces FGM with improved strength with the replacement up to 20% than that of the control FGM. The use of FA and RHA is very effective in enhancing strength at the later age of FGM.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

182-188

Citation:

Online since:

April 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] A.M. Neville, Properties of Concrete, 5th ed. England: Pearson Education Limited, (2011).

Google Scholar

[2] V. Sata, J. Tangpagasit, C. Jaturapitakkul and P. Chindaprasirt, Effect of W/B ratios on pozzolanic reaction of biomass ashes in Portland cement matrix, Cem. Concr. Compos. 34 (1) (2012) 94–100.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2011.09.003

Google Scholar

[3] R. Siddique, Performance characteristics of high-volume Class F fly ash concrete, Cem. Concr. Res. 34 (3) (2004) 487–493.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2003.09.002

Google Scholar

[4] G. Li and X. Wu, Influence of fly ash and its mean particle size on certain engineering properties of cement composite mortars, Cem. Concr. Res. 35 (6) (2005) 1128–1134.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.08.014

Google Scholar

[5] M. Islam and S. Islam, Strength Behaviour of Mortar Using Fly Ash as Partial Replacement of Cement, 1 (3) (2010) 98-106.

Google Scholar

[6] S.J. Choi, S.S. Lee and P. Monteiro, Effect of Fly Ash Fineness on Temperature Rise, Setting, and Strength Development of Mortar, J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 24 (5) (2012) 499–505.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0000411

Google Scholar

[7] A.A. Ramezanianpour, M. Mahdi and G. Ahmadibeni, The Effect of Rice Husk Ash on Mechanical Properties and Durability of Sustainable Concretes, Int. J. Civ. Eng. 7 (2) (2009) 83–91.

Google Scholar

[8] M.R. Karim, M.F.M. Zain, M. Jamil and F.C. Lai, Significance of Waste Materials in Sustainable Concrete and Sustainable Development, Int. J. of Biotechnol. and Envir. Manage. 18 (2011) 43–47.

Google Scholar

[9] J. Sousa Coutinho, The combined benefits of CPF and RHA in improving the durability of concrete structures, Cem. Concr. Compos. 25 (1) (2003) 51–59.

DOI: 10.1016/s0958-9465(01)00055-5

Google Scholar

[10] M. Safiuddin, J.S. West and K.A. Soudki, Flowing ability of the mortars formulated from self-compacting concretes incorporating rice husk ash, Constr. Build. Mater. 25 (2) (2011) 973–978.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.06.084

Google Scholar

[11] P. Chindaprasirt and S. Rukzon, Strength, porosity and corrosion resistance of ternary blend Portland cement, rice husk ash and fly ash mortar, Constr. Build. Mater. 22 (8) (2008) 1601–1606.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.06.010

Google Scholar

[12] H. Toutanji, N. Delatte, S. Aggoun, R. Duval and a. Danson, Effect of supplementary cementitious materials on the compressive strength and durability of short-term cured concrete, Cem. Concr. Res. 34 (2) (2004) 311–319.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2003.08.017

Google Scholar

[13] A.N. Givi, S.A. Rashid, F.N.A. Aziz and M.A.M. Salleh, Assessment of the effects of rice husk ash particle size on strength, water permeability and workability of binary blended concrete, Constr. Build. Mater. 24 (11) (2010) 2145–2150.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122929

Google Scholar

[14] T. Brockmann, Mechanical and Fracture Mechanical Properties of Fine Grained Concrete for Textile Reinforced Composites, RWTH Aachen, (2005).

Google Scholar

[15] S. Xu and M. Krüger, Bond characteristics of carbon, alkali resistant glass, and aramid textiles in mortar, J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 16 (4) (2004) 356–364.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0899-1561(2004)16:4(356)

Google Scholar

[16] J. Hegger, N. Will, O. Bruckermann and S. Voss, Load–bearing behaviour and simulation of textile reinforced concrete, Mater. Struct. 39 (8) (2006) 765–776.

DOI: 10.1617/s11527-005-9039-y

Google Scholar

[17] M. Curbach and S. Schreerer, Concrete Light - Possibilities and Visions, in Proceedings fib Symposium PRAGUE 2011, (2011), 29–44.

Google Scholar

[18] F. Schladitz and M. Curbach, Torsion tests on textile-reinforced concrete strengthened specimens, Mater. Struct. 45 (1–2) (2011) 31–40.

DOI: 10.1617/s11527-011-9746-5

Google Scholar

[19] F. Schladitz, M. Frenzel, D. Ehlig and M. Curbach, Bending load capacity of reinforced concrete slabs strengthened with textile reinforced concrete, Eng. Struct. 40 (2012) 317–326.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.02.029

Google Scholar

[20] J. Hegger and S. Voss, Investigations on the bearing behaviour and application potential of textile reinforced concrete, Eng. Struct. 30 (7) (2008) 2050–(2056).

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.01.006

Google Scholar

[21] K. Erdogdu and P. Tucker, Effect of Fly Ash Particles Size on Strength of Portland Cement Fly Ash Mortars, Cem. Conrete Res. 28 (9) (1998) 1217–1222.

DOI: 10.1016/s0008-8846(98)00116-1

Google Scholar

[22] B. Banholzer, T. Brockmann and W. Brameshuber, Material and bonding characteristics for dimensioning and modelling of textile reinforced concrete (TRC) elements, Mater. Struct. 39 (8) (2006) 749–763.

DOI: 10.1617/s11527-006-9140-x

Google Scholar

[23] A. Brückner, R. Ortlepp and M. Curbach, Textile reinforced concrete for strengthening in bending and shear, Mater. Struct. 39 (8) (2006) 741–748.

DOI: 10.1617/s11527-005-9027-2

Google Scholar

[24] J. Hartig, U. Häußler-Combe and K. Schicktanz, Influence of bond properties on the tensile behaviour of Textile Reinforced Concrete, Cem. Concr. Compos. 30 (10) (2008) 898–906.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2008.08.004

Google Scholar

[25] M. Butler, V. Mechtcherine and S. Hempel, Experimental investigations on the durability of fibre–matrix interfaces in textile-reinforced concrete, Cem. Concr. Compos. 31, (4) (2009) 221–231.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.02.005

Google Scholar

[26] R. Ortlepp, U. Hampel and M. Curbach, A new approach for evaluating bond capacity of TRC strengthening, Cem. Concr. Compos. 28 (7) (2006) 589–597.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2006.05.003

Google Scholar

[27] British Standard, BS 4551: 2005-Mortar — Methods of test for mortar — Chemical analysis and physical testing, (2005).

Google Scholar

[28] British Standard, BS EN 196-1: 2005. Methods of testing cement — Part 1: Determination of stength, (2005).

Google Scholar

[29] ASTM International, Standard Specification for Coal Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for Use, (2013).

DOI: 10.1520/c0618-00

Google Scholar

[30] P. Chindaprasirt, C. Jaturapitakkul and T. Sinsiri, Effect of fly ash fineness on compressive strength and pore size of blended cement paste, Cem. Concr. Compos. 27 (4) (2005) 425–428.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2004.07.003

Google Scholar

[31] Y. Wong, L. Lam, C. Poon and F. Zhou, Properties of fly ash-modified cement mortar-aggregate interfaces, Cem. Concr. Res. 29 (1999) 1905–(1913).

DOI: 10.1016/s0008-8846(99)00189-1

Google Scholar