Comparison of Mechanical Properties of Fly Ash Artificial Geopolymer Aggregates with Natural Aggregate

Article Preview

Abstract:

This study was conducted to compare the mechanical properties of fly ash artificial geopolymer aggregates with natural aggregate (rock) in term of its impact strength, specific gravity and water absorption.The raw materials used were fly ash, sodium hydroxide, sodium silicate and natural aggregate. After the artificial geopolymer aggregate has been produced, its water absorption, specific gravity and aggregate impact test has been done. All results obtained were compared to natural aggregate. The result shows that the fly ash geopolymer aggregate are lighter than natural aggregate in term of its specific gravity. The impact value for fly ash artificial geopolymer aggregate slightly high compared to natural aggregate while it has high water absorption value compared to natural aggregate. As conclusion, the fly ash artificial geopolymer aggregate can be used as one of the construction materials in concrete as an alternative for coarse aggregate besides natural aggregate with more lightweight properties.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

290-295

Citation:

Online since:

April 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Muzek, M.N., Zelic, J. and Jozic, D. (2012). Microstructural characteristics of geopolymers based on alkali activated fly ash. Chem. BiochemEnginering, 26(2), 89-95.

Google Scholar

[2] Arivalagan, S. (2014). Experimental study on conventional concrete by replacement of coarse aggregate to fly ash coarse aggregate. American Journal of Civil and Structural Engineering, 1(2), 18-22.

DOI: 10.12966/ajcse.04.01.2014

Google Scholar

[3] YudthanaLeelathaWornsuk. (2009). The Role Sodium Hydroxide Concentration in Fly-Ash based Geopolymer. vol. 1, pp.16-17.

Google Scholar

[4] Sathish Kumar, V, BlessenSkariah Thomas, Alex Christopher. (2012). the Properties of Glass Fibre Reinforced Geopolymer Concrete. vol. 2, pp.722-726.

Google Scholar

[5] Kong, L. Y, Daniel and Sanjayan, Jay, G. (2008). Damage Behavior of GeopolymerComposites Exposed to Elevated Temperatures. vol. 30, pp.986-991.

Google Scholar

[6] VijayaRangan, B. (2006). Fly Ash Based Geopolymer Concrete. vol. 1, pp.1-17.

Google Scholar

[7] Nizar, I.K., Mustafa, A.M., Rafiza, A.R., Kamarudin, H., Alida, A., and Zarina, Y. (2014). Study on physical and chemical properties of fly ash from different area in Malaysia. Key Engineering Materials, (594-595), 985-989.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.594-595.985

Google Scholar

[8] Mustafa, A.M., Kamarudin, H., BnHussain, M., Nizar, I.K., and Mastura, W.I.W. (2011). Mechanism and chemical reaction of fly ash geopolymer cement – a review. Journal of Asian Scientific Research, 1(5), 247-253.

Google Scholar

[9] Hardjito, D. and Anthoni (2014). Exploring the potentials of Sidoarjo Volcanic Mud as construction materials. Malaysia – Indonesia Geopolymer Symposium, PWTC, Kuala Lumpur.

Google Scholar

[10] Mohan, G.G., Priyadharshini, P., and Santhi, A.S. (2011). Experimental study on cold bonded fly ash aggregates. International Journal of Civil and Structural Engineering, 2(2), 493-501.

Google Scholar

[11] Kockal, N.U., and Ozturan, T. (2011). Durability of lightweight concretes with lightweight fly ash aggregates. Construction and Building Materials, 25(4), 1430-1438.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.09.022

Google Scholar

[12] Rafiza, A.R. Mustafa, A.M., Kamarudin, H. Nizar, I.K. Hardjito, D. and Zarina, Y. (2013). Evaluation of pelletized artificial geopolymer aggregate manufactured from volcano ash. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 7(5), 15-20.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.594-595.83

Google Scholar

[13] Rafiza, A.R. Mustafa, A.M., Kamarudin, H. Nizar, I.K. Hardjito, D. and Zarina, Y. (2013). Evaluation of pelletized artificial geopolymer aggregate manufactured from volcano ash. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 7(5), 15-20.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.594-595.83

Google Scholar