Comparison of Chloride Binding Capacity of Binary and Ternary Binders

Article Preview

Abstract:

Reinforced concrete structures work in the marine environment are easily erroded by the environment, the most dangerous intrusion by chloride ions. Chloride ions from the environment penetrate into concrete layer and cause reinforcement corrosion. The high chloride binding capacity in concrete helps reducing the reinforcement corrosion. The chloride binding capacity in concrete is largely dependent on the cement type. This paper investigated the chloride binding capacity of various binary and ternary binders. Chloride contents in mortars prepared with various binary and tinery binders were determined by chemical titration methods combining with microstructure analysis SEM. The experimental results showed that the chloride binding capacity of tinery binders which contains Ordinary Portland cement (OPC), blast furnace slag mixed with silica fume is highest.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

336-341

Citation:

Online since:

April 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] T.U. Mohammed and H. Hamada. Cement and Concrete Research 33 (2003), p.1487 – (1940).

Google Scholar

[2] Rui Luo, Yuebo Cai, Changyi Wang and Xiaoming Huang. Cement and Concrete Research 33 (2003), p.1 – 7.

Google Scholar

[3] A.A. Landman: Ph.D. thesis, University of Pretoria, (2003).

Google Scholar

[4] Anik Delagrave, Jacques Marchand, Jean-Pierre Ollivier, Simone Julien, and Kati Hazrati. Advn Cem Bas Mat (1997), p.28 – 35.

Google Scholar

[5] G.K. Glass and N.R. Buenfeld. Corrosion Science 42 (2000), pp.329-344.

Google Scholar

[6] ASTM C1152. American Society for Testing and Materials Standards, Philadelphia (1997).

Google Scholar

[7] ASTM C1218. American Society for Testing and Materials Standards, Philadelphia (1997).

Google Scholar

[8] Erik P. Nielsen, Duncan Herfort and Mette R. Geiker. Cement and Concrete Research 35 (2005), p.117 – 123.

Google Scholar